Is the Pac 12 poised to rise from the dead? The answer may surprise you

[PurpleJ]

That's a lot of ifs. I thought the conference would come back when Stanford had Harbaugh and Oregon had Chip, but they left and it all went to shit again. USC eventually comes back, but when? Now that we know UW isn't coming back, the future looks a lot worse. Cristobal won't stay at Oregon if he's good and Chip still has a lot of work to do at UCLA.

Oregon will pay whatever it takes to keep him if he's good.

Can they become his alma mater? I didn't think so. He's a Cane if he's good.

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

That's a lot of ifs. I thought the conference would come back when Stanford had Harbaugh and Oregon had Chip, but they left and it all went to shit again. USC eventually comes back, but when? Now that we know UW isn't coming back, the future looks a lot worse. Cristobal won't stay at Oregon if he's good and Chip still has a lot of work to do at UCLA.

Oregon will pay whatever it takes to keep him if he's good.

Can they become his alma mater? I didn't think so. He's a Cane if he's good.

Not if Richt is good too. Richt needs to win just enough to keep his job.

 

[MisterEm]

That's a lot of ifs. I thought the conference would come back when Stanford had Harbaugh and Oregon had Chip, but they left and it all went to shit again. USC eventually comes back, but when? Now that we know UW isn't coming back, the future looks a lot worse. Cristobal won't stay at Oregon if he's good and Chip still has a lot of work to do at UCLA.

Oregon will pay whatever it takes to keep him if he's good.

Can they become his alma mater? I didn't think so. He's a Cane if he's good.

Not if Richt is good too. Richt needs to win just enough to keep his job.

Better consult your Ouija Boards*

 

[UWhuskytskeet]

That's a lot of ifs. I thought the conference would come back when Stanford had Harbaugh and Oregon had Chip, but they left and it all went to shit again. USC eventually comes back, but when? Now that we know UW isn't coming back, the future looks a lot worse. Cristobal won't stay at Oregon if he's good and Chip still has a lot of work to do at UCLA.

Oregon will pay whatever it takes to keep him if he's good.

Can they become his alma mater? I didn't think so. He's a Cane if he's good.

Not if Richt is good too. Richt needs to win just enough to keep his job.

Rich is the only #16 Virginia can beat.

 

[Kaepsknee]

LIPO with Chip. It was one game vs Cal.

Races PTSD with Chip is real.

Chip will get it done

I see we have another victim. If getting it done means a ceiling of 8-4 with a Foster Farms trophy, then sure.gif.

 

[Mosster47]

Aaron Feld was asked by the Eugene media if athletes were just better in the south than out west and he said athletes are the same everywhere, but the south does a better job with their S&C programs getting players to a higher weight ceiling while keeping their athleticism.

Then he's an idiot (big news flash!).

The south has considerably more black people ergo considerably bigger pool of athletes to draw from.

Does S & C matter? Of course. It's a big fucking deal.

So is genetics.

Hilarious that a strength coach thinks the only differentiator is what he happens to do. Even funnier that you buy into it. Not surprising though.

Then how does USC with a real coach go to Jordan-Hare and win 41-0 and never let Aubbie past mid-field?

The Pac-12 hasn't had a real coach that can recruit, cares about the weight room, and gets after it since Petey left.

 

[Pitchfork51]

The pac will get better of course.

But man that Graham helfrich Sark Mora combo was ugly

 

[RaceBannon]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

 

[Pitchfork51]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

Hey loser

Victory has defeated you

 

[RaceBannon]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

Hey loser

Victory has defeated you

Loser? Check the scoreboard bitch

 

[RoadDawg55]

LIPO with Chip. It was one game vs Cal.

Races PTSD with Chip is real.

Chip will get it done

I see we have another victim. If getting it done means a ceiling of 8-4 with a Foster Farms trophy, then sure.gif.

I'm with the Coog. Chip dominating was years ago.

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

Chip will struggle with Oregon, Stanford and Washington every year that he plays these teams. The others he might run over rather easily once his system is in place, but physical teams are his kryptonite.

 

[HillsboroDuck]

Chip will struggle with Oregon, Stanford and Washington every year that he plays these teams. The others he might run over rather easily once his system is in place, but physical teams are his kryptonite.

Utah?

 

[oregonblitzkrieg]

Chip will struggle with Oregon, Stanford and Washington every year that he plays these teams. The others he might run over rather easily once his system is in place, but physical teams are his kryptonite.

Utah?

They aren't on the same level. They're good, but still a lower tier PAC team. Doesn't mean they can't be a problem for every team on that list though.

 

[Kaepsknee]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

WSU pretty much has owned UCLA over the last 20 years. But keep on cowering in the corner.

 

[RaceBannon]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

WSU pretty much has owned UCLA over the last 20 years. But keep on cowering in the corner.

How am I cowering by thinking a 47-11 coach will be successful at a talent rich school?

 

[PurpleJ]

I stand with Chip. Us nazi fags gotta stick together!

 

[Kaepsknee]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

WSU pretty much has owned UCLA over the last 20 years. But keep on cowering in the corner.

How am I cowering by thinking a 47-11 coach will be successful at a talent rich school?

You’re believing Chip catches lightning in a bottle twice.

In fact I kind of equate Chips success with Trumps Presidential victory. Both Trump and Chip changed the gayme. No one had ever seen anything like them before.

They initially said that Chips Offense was a gimmick and would never beat the better teams. But then He laid waste to opponent after opponent after opponent.

And then. Before you knew it, they were in the Natty. Trump won his Natty but Chip came up a bit short.

But unlike Trump, almost every other team copied what Chip was doing in some way even before He got to the Natty game.

And now Chip and Trump couldn’t be any more different. Trump continues to keep teams off balance with new plays. Whereas Chip has been forced to play status quo because his plays have been figured out. A victim of his own success really.

OT: If I get another “draft has been saved window” interruption when typing a sentence, I’m gonna find Mr Vanilla.

Bottom line is that Chip isn’t the innovator that He once was. Couple that with the dyed in the wool soft of UCLA Football and 8-4 is the ramped up.

 

[JaWarrenJaHooker]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

WSU pretty much has owned UCLA over the last 20 years. But keep on cowering in the corner.

How am I cowering by thinking a 47-11 coach will be successful at a talent rich school?

You’re believing Chip catches lightning in a bottle twice.

In fact I kind of equate Chips success with Trumps Presidential victory. Both Trump and Chip changed the gayme. No one had ever seen anything like them before.

They initially said that Chips Offense was a gimmick and would never beat the better teams. But then He laid waste to opponent after opponent after opponent.

And then. Before you knew it, they were in the Natty. Trump won his Natty but Chip came up a bit short.

But unlike Trump, almost every other team copied what Chip was doing in some way even before He got to the Natty game.

And now Chip and Trump couldn’t be any more different. Trump continues to keep teams off balance with new plays. Whereas Chip has been forced to play status quo because his plays have been figured out. A victim of his own success really.

OT: If I get another “draft has been saved window” interruption when typing a sentence, I’m gonna find Mr Vanilla.

Bottom line is that Chip isn’t the innovator that He once was. Couple that with the dyed in the wool soft of UCLA Football and 8-4 is the ramped up.

It was never about scheme. It was about culture

 

[Mosster47]

Yes it it ludicrous to think a guy with a 43-7 record at Oregon could win big at UCLA

The victims are the ones in denial on this simple little fact

Just one more team WSU will never climb over

WSU pretty much has owned UCLA over the last 20 years. But keep on cowering in the corner.

How am I cowering by thinking a 47-11 coach will be successful at a talent rich school?

You’re believing Chip catches lightning in a bottle twice.

In fact I kind of equate Chips success with Trumps Presidential victory. Both Trump and Chip changed the gayme. No one had ever seen anything like them before.

They initially said that Chips Offense was a gimmick and would never beat the better teams. But then He laid waste to opponent after opponent after opponent.

And then. Before you knew it, they were in the Natty. Trump won his Natty but Chip came up a bit short.

But unlike Trump, almost every other team copied what Chip was doing in some way even before He got to the Natty game.

And now Chip and Trump couldn’t be any more different. Trump continues to keep teams off balance with new plays. Whereas Chip has been forced to play status quo because his plays have been figured out. A victim of his own success really.

OT: If I get another “draft has been saved window” interruption when typing a sentence, I’m gonna find Mr Vanilla.

Bottom line is that Chip isn’t the innovator that He once was. Couple that with the dyed in the wool soft of UCLA Football and 8-4 is the ramped up.

It was never about scheme. It was about culture

This is 100% false. Chip was great at Oregon because of scheme.

He never did beat the good ones though. He went .500 against Stanford and Rich Rod (who was Chip before Chip), and lost to Boise, tOSU, LSU, and Cam Newton.

He did beat Wisconsin and KState who are small timers.

Chip hit a perfect scenario at a perfect time against an awful conference. UW was awful, Wazzu was historically awful, USC had under 60 scholarship players (still beat him), and everyone else was their normal shit selves.