Indiana wins rather easily, say 33-17?

it ain’t the backup QB I’m worried about. Indiana has two backs who are lighting it up and last I checked, a turnstile could stop the run better than UW.
Here’s what will happen: Indiana will run for more than 150 yards in the first half and have a 7 to 10 point lead. UW will think, “if we can just stop the run, we’ll be ok.” So UW does that pretty well … only to have the backup QB then throw for over 200 yards in the second half.
There’s your 16-point win. Place your bets and thank me later.
 
There's an element of these games that are more fun and less stressful than being 8-0 with ASU on deck. Lets go shock the world and beat Indiana at football
 
I don't believe a team that can beat Michigan will lose to IU. Even people that went to IU aren't really football fans. Without their starter, they are going to plummet like a lead zeppelin. We? will win. Bank on it.
 
AOG said:
I don't believe a team that can beat Michigan will lose to IU. Even people that went to IU aren't really football fans. Without their starter, they are going to plummet like a lead zeppelin. We? will win. Bank on it.
Click to expand...
Have you seen what Michigan is doing this year?
They appear to have hired their Gilby. Skipped straight over their Lambright era. Quite impressive, actually.
 
BleachedAnusDawg said:
AOG said:
I don't believe a team that can beat Michigan will lose to IU. Even people that went to IU aren't really football fans. Without their starter, they are going to plummet like a lead zeppelin. We? will win. Bank on it.
Click to expand...
Have you seen what Michigan is doing this year?
They appear to have hired their Gilby. Skipped straight over their Lambright era. Quite impressive, actually.
Click to expand...
OK!
I may be incorrect.
 
TheHB said:
it ain’t the backup QB I’m worried about. Indiana has two backs who are lighting it up and last I checked, a turnstile could stop the run better than UW.
Here’s what will happen: Indiana will run for more than 150 yards in the first half and have a 7 to 10 point lead. UW will think, “if we can just stop the run, we’ll be ok.” So UW does that pretty well … only to have the backup QB then throw for over 200 yards in the second half.
There’s your 16-point win. Place your bets and thank me later.
Click to expand...
Coleman has 100 more yards than their leading rusher and we barely use Coleman
I'll believe Indiana with the backup is legit when I see it

Until then? DAWGS finally put it together on the road.

The gameday festivities might not actually help the Who?siers, and end up being a distraction
 
Last edited:
We may lose, but they ain't blowing us out. I like my dawgs in this one regardless. Indiana is getting fluffed way too much for my liking.
 
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
TheHB said:
it ain’t the backup QB I’m worried about. Indiana has two backs who are lighting it up and last I checked, a turnstile could stop the run better than UW.
Here’s what will happen: Indiana will run for more than 150 yards in the first half and have a 7 to 10 point lead. UW will think, “if we can just stop the run, we’ll be ok.” So UW does that pretty well … only to have the backup QB then throw for over 200 yards in the second half.
There’s your 16-point win. Place your bets and thank me later.
Click to expand...
Coleman has 100 more yards than their leading rusher and we barely use Coleman
I'll believe Indiana with the backup is legit when I see it

Until then? DAWGS finally put it together on the road.

The gameday festivities might not actually help the Who?siers, and end up being a distraction
Click to expand...
Two backs have combined for 900 yards and 16 TDs, with over a 6 yard per carry average. If UW goes in worried about stopping the backup quarterback, this game is over before it starts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top