I'm hearing quid pro quo is out

RaceBannon

RaceBannon

Moderator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat

Because no aid was withheld or threatened

But Trump
 
Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat

Because no aid was withheld or threatened

But Trump
Click to expand...

Yeah HH caught wind of what to say and is now addressing it as "extortion".
 
Bribery is quid pro quo. Don’t quit your day “job”.
Click to expand...

We have the transcript of the call. No quid pro quo

So the pivot to bribery

Nothing there either

The change was for the low information team hondo
 
Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat

Because no aid was withheld or threatened

But Trump
Click to expand...

Yeah HH caught wind of what to say and is now addressing it as "extortion".
Click to expand...

I’m a little hurt you haven’t been reading my stuff for the past couple of months.
 
I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
 
State Department official George Kent testified Wednesday that he would “love” to see Ukraine look into the circumstances surrounding the closure of a probe tied to natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, while also raising concerns that Hunter Biden’s role on the board of that firm created the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Sounds like Kent agrees that Biden isn't above the law
 
It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...
 
It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...
Click to expand...

It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.
 
The people with first hand knowledge have already said there was no threat

Or bribery

Or quid pro quo

The transcript showed that when Trump released it
 
It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...
Click to expand...

It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.
Click to expand...

None of your witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why do you think that is cirrhosis? If they supposedly heard this information third hand, they certainly must know who heard it first hand. Again, why do you think that is cirrhosis?
 
I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
Click to expand...

Works in court......
 
I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
Click to expand...
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.
 
It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.

Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...
Click to expand...

It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.
Click to expand...

All the adults read the transcript. Not sure what Jennifer said to you.

Teenage girls...
 
I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
Click to expand...
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.
Click to expand...

We already know what the first hand witnesses said

No quid pro quo

 
Imagine claiming you have a whistleblower then crying because people who actually heard the call said nothing is there

And your whistleblower is nowhere to be found
 
I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:

"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
Click to expand...
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.
Click to expand...

We already know what the first hand witnesses said

No quid pro quo
Click to expand...

Of course there was a quid pro quo. “Get over it.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top