I'm calling it now

We wanted the Big 16 in 2010
Pac 8 was the west
ASU and Arizona along with 6 Big 12 teams was the east. Could have kept Texas Oklahoma and AM out of the SEC
Instead we got Utah and Colorado and the deathwatch began

In hindsight, that really was the beginning of the end.
 
Private Equity guy
Do we really need these high priced players? We could outsource to India and save a bundle. Or AI players in a virtual reality game
Let's get creative people
Like most things PE, that gets reversed once it sucks
you're an expert on PE too? what range you have
Youre the expert on getting butthurt on message board shit posting, so you have that feather in your cap.
 
The divisions in the Big 10 should have already happened, but they won't because the powers that be want to game the system and set up schedules the way they want to and in the Big 10 they do not want to have to have Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State stuck having to take each other out.
It makes no sense we don't play the west coast schools home and home forever and that we don't play the western Big 10 schools like Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa as our main schedule to at least lessen some of the travel load.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the three flagship Big 10 programs have take trips to Husky Stadium in the first 3 years.
One funny thing is they probably gave Indiana easy schedules and thought who fucking cares, they'll never win anything and now they've set up a monster.
 
Last edited:
I remember some savvy guys on Dawgman in the late 1990s said that super conferences would be formed…UW would be part of that.
Then 10-12 of the biggest teams would eventually leave those super conferences and try to get Notre Dame-type TV deals.

The B1G will continue to protect their top 2 moneymakers through corrupt ref-officiating. I've been watching Big 10 games for 40 years. Somebody should make a compilation of all the bad calls, which go in Ohio State and Michigan's favor. It could be hours long… Watch a bunch of Minnesota vs Michigan games, and you'll puke at how bad Minnesota constantly gets screwed over…4-6 bad calls in those games every year, and always in Michigan's favor. (Every play needs to be reviewable.)

I want the Pac 4 in the B1G to stay strong. The B1G heads will try to weaken them over time.

I'd say UW stays in the B1G until close to 2040, then the Pac 4 will be very tired of their crap by then.
UW constantly ranked between 15th-40th is going to frustrate a lot of UW fans.

ESPN will die, I'm not going to pay $100/month for ESPN in 10 years.

A new Pac conference with fractional shares will inevitably be formed. Maybe USC will get one of those Notre Dame deals. Seattle will be one of the top 5 biggest cities in the US, so maybe UW will eventually get an ND deal too.
 
The divisions in the Big 10 should have already happened, but they won't because the powers that be want to game the system and set up schedules the way they want to and in the Big 10 they do not want to have to have Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State stuck having to take each other out.
It makes no sense we don't play the west coast schools home and home forever and that we don't play the western Big 10 schools like Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa as our main schedule to at least lessen some of the travel load.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the three flagship Big 10 programs have take trips to Husky Stadium in the first 3 years.
One funny thing is they probably gave Indiana easy schedules and thought who fucking cares, they'll never win anything and now they've set up a monster.
Do we? alternate USC/UCLA or has that just been happenstance?
I think divisions are stupid but having 3 locked-in regional opponents annually makes sense (vs 1). SEC just went to 3 annual rivalry games with the new 9 game scheduling. That would take care of it for the 4 west coasters.
Am I wrong, but don't some of the B1G teams already have more than 1 "rival" game per year?
 
Last edited:
The divisions in the Big 10 should have already happened, but they won't because the powers that be want to game the system and set up schedules the way they want to and in the Big 10 they do not want to have to have Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State stuck having to take each other out.
It makes no sense we don't play the west coast schools home and home forever and that we don't play the western Big 10 schools like Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa as our main schedule to at least lessen some of the travel load.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the three flagship Big 10 programs have take trips to Husky Stadium in the first 3 years.
One funny thing is they probably gave Indiana easy schedules and thought who fucking cares, they'll never win anything and now they've set up a monster.
Do we? alternate USC/UCLA or has that just been happenstance?
I think divisions are stupid but having 3 locked-in regional opponents annually makes sense (vs 1). SEC just went to 3 annual rivalry games with the new 9 game scheduling. That would take care of it for the 4 west coasters.
Am I wrong, but don't some of the B1G teams already have more than 1 "rival" game per year?
Every original team in the BIG 10 gets some dumb trophy every time they beat one of the other Midwest schools.
 
I remember some savvy guys on Dawgman in the late 1990s said that super conferences would be formed…UW would be part of that.
Then 10-12 of the biggest teams would eventually leave those super conferences and try to get Notre Dame-type TV deals.

The B1G will continue to protect their top 2 moneymakers through corrupt ref-officiating. I've been watching Big 10 games for 40 years. Somebody should make a compilation of all the bad calls, which go in Ohio State and Michigan's favor. It could be hours long… Watch a bunch of Minnesota vs Michigan games, and you'll puke at how bad Minnesota constantly gets screwed over…4-6 bad calls in those games every year, and always in Michigan's favor. (Every play needs to be reviewable.)

I want the Pac 4 in the B1G to stay strong. The B1G heads will try to weaken them over time.

I'd say UW stays in the B1G until close to 2040, then the Pac 4 will be very tired of their crap by then.
UW constantly ranked between 15th-40th is going to frustrate a lot of UW fans.

ESPN will die, I'm not going to pay $100/month for ESPN in 10 years.

A new Pac conference with fractional shares will inevitably be formed. Maybe USC will get one of those Notre Dame deals. Seattle will be one of the top 5 biggest cities in the US, so maybe UW will eventually get an ND deal too.
I mean, Oregon beat Ohio State and Michigan last year when the wefs were B1G wefs
That said, the wefs suck ass, but this level of conspiracy ain't it
 
The divisions in the Big 10 should have already happened, but they won't because the powers that be want to game the system and set up schedules the way they want to and in the Big 10 they do not want to have to have Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State stuck having to take each other out.
It makes no sense we don't play the west coast schools home and home forever and that we don't play the western Big 10 schools like Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa as our main schedule to at least lessen some of the travel load.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the three flagship Big 10 programs have take trips to Husky Stadium in the first 3 years.
One funny thing is they probably gave Indiana easy schedules and thought who fucking cares, they'll never win anything and now they've set up a monster.
Do we? alternate USC/UCLA or has that just been happenstance?
I think divisions are stupid but having 3 locked-in regional opponents annually makes sense (vs 1). SEC just went to 3 annual rivalry games with the new 9 game scheduling. That would take care of it for the 4 west coasters.
Am I wrong, but don't some of the B1G teams already have more than 1 "rival" game per year?
Every original team in the BIG 10 gets some dumb trophy every time they beat one of the other Midwest schools.
Yes, but there are "protected games" played annually.
Here's the list:

1000022309.jpg

Punch line: Iowa has 3, Purdue 2, Illinois 2, Wisconsin 2, Minnesota 2, Michigan 2.
One team already gets 3 locked-in opponents annually. Make it so for every team, just like the new SEC model. Solves the west coast travel thing for football.
 
Olympic sports should be. Football won't be. The next media contract is gonna be like $90,000,000 a year per program.
I'm honestly shocked this hasn't happened yet. Football and basketball should be in separate conferences. Everything else should be regional smaller conferences. Not that hard. Cuts the cost of administering the Olympic sports down to a fraction. No reason we should be flying softball, baseball, whatever teams to Rutgers. Let them play on the west coast.

1000034429.png
 
Yeah, I'm pretty sure there's no specific rhyme or reason to when Oregon and Washington play the LA schools right now. Which is dumb given I assume they make sure to schedule those random Big 10 games with like a hatpin or some shit you get if you win.
I just don't buy any grand officiating schemes (other than the NBA). The level of mouth shutting required to execute it would be so fucking hard. I do think officials are affected by perceptions of certain programs and coaches and how certain coaches work them, though not nearly as bad as college basketball, which is borderline unwatchable because of it at times.
 
Olympic sports should be. Football won't be. The next media contract is gonna be like $90,000,000 a year per program.
I'm honestly shocked this hasn't happened yet. Football and basketball should be in separate conferences. Everything else should be regional smaller conferences. Not that hard. Cuts the cost of administering the Olympic sports down to a fraction. No reason we should be flying softball, baseball, whatever teams to Rutgers. Let them play on the west coast.

1000034429.png
Good edits.
 
Do Maryland & Rutgers get all jacked up for that big game each year?

(honestly asking .. have no clue .. sounds like a total nothing burger to me)
 
Do Maryland & Rutgers get all jacked up for that big game each year?

(honestly asking .. have no clue .. sounds like a total nothing burger to me)
Maryland had their first sell out in 2 years and Rutgers had their black out game against us so I guess the B1G is getting a sweet deal with the half share right now
 
Do Maryland & Rutgers get all jacked up for that big game each year?

(honestly asking .. have no clue .. sounds like a total nothing burger to me)
Maryland had their first sell out in 2 years and Rutgers had their black out game against us so I guess the B1G is getting a sweet deal with the half share right now
Sorry, I should have been more clear.

I meant the game of Maryland vs Rutgers
Is that an actual "rivalry" game?
 
Back
Top