If we win tomorrow... prepare for idiots

We already know when Petersen wins next year it will be credited to Sark. Just like idiots out there like PLSS credit Rick's Rose Bowl win to Lambo.
Click to expand...

Not this guy. I never credited JL for RN's roses, and I won't credit SS for CP's.

Coaching > Recruiting
 
We already know when Petersen wins next year it will be credited to Sark. Just like idiots out there like PLSS credit Rick's Rose Bowl win to Lambo.
Click to expand...

Not this guy. I never credited JL for RN's roses, and I won't credit SS for CP's.

Coaching > Recruiting
Click to expand...

I was referring more to Doogman crowd. The pro Sark crowd will go "Well Sark had the program moving in the right direction and probably would have won (insert whatever number of wins Petersen has) too if not more."
 
Nah, by then Sark will be thoroughly exposed as a fraud at USC, and all those Shart-for-Sark doogs will have changed their usernames.
 
Nah, by then Sark will be thoroughly exposed as a fraud at USC, and all those Shart-for-Sark doogs will have changed their usernames.
Click to expand...

Good point just like "nobody" ever supported the Tyrone Willingham for year four let alone even wanted him hired.

Crazy how my memory of 2007 failed me because I don't recall 100% in favor of wanting Ty gone despite what everyone claims now.
 
The good thing about if Petersen takes us to a Rose Bowl is that Sark will be failing at USC so it will be easy to have evidence to show that Sark sucks and we weren't sniffing the Rose Bowl with him. Nobody should need any more evidence than the 5-4 conference records, but Sark going 5-4 at USC will cement the argument. Even if all of this happens, there will still be a few fucktards who will give credit to Sark. I won't be surprised if Kim is one of them.
 
Last edited:
The good thing about if Petersen takes us to a Rose Bowl is that Sark will be failing at USC so it will be easy to have evidence to show that Sark sucks and we weren't sniffing the Rose Bowl with him. Nobody should need any more evidence than the 5-4 conference records, but Sark going 5-4 at USC will cement the argument. Even if all of this happens, there will still be a few fucktards who will give credit to Sark. I won't be surprised if Kim is one of them.
Click to expand...

Kim will definitely be one of those fucktards but you are correct on the USC part.

Unlike the Rick/Lambo situation, we didn't have Lambo coaching a more prestigious school in conference at the same time.

So you are right if Petersen is doing well, most likely Sark will be failing at USC. Kim will be the last one holdover and will be bringing up Kiffin leaving him a mess you watch.

However, hopefully by then most Doogs will have figured out Kim is all about himself(access).

I know some of my pro Sark doogs didn't care for Eklund's article today and are starting to finally see that I wasn't full of it on my Doogman bashing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top