His name would be David Toy.
He would get his ass kicked?
He would get his ass kicked?
David Toy was an up-and-coming star at tailback in 1985. But in the second game of the year he fumbled 2-3 times against BYU. He was benched the rest of the season, and the next spring he was the backup safety.
He would get his ass kicked?
David Toy was an up-and-coming star at tailback in 1985. But in the second game of the year he fumbled 2-3 times against BYU. He was benched the rest of the season, and the next spring he was the backup safety.
More memories of the Mormans stealing our natty
He would get his ass kicked?
David Toy was an up-and-coming star at tailback in 1985. But in the second game of the year he fumbled 2-3 times against BYU. He was benched the rest of the season, and the next spring he was the backup safety.
More memories of the Mormans stealing our natty
No way Peterman cares about winning when DWarsh goes back out there.
How can you convince your team you're about winning when you are more worried about the confidence of a loser than winning?
DWarsh was the cause of that loss.
No way Peterman cares about winning when DWarsh goes back out there.
How can you convince your team you're about winning when you are more worried about the confidence of a loser than winning?
DWarsh was the cause of that loss.
Pete was at the heart of that loss.
From allowing the Swede package to ruin two 1st and 10's, to keeping Dwarsh in front of Gaskin after the first fumble.
It's on Pete.
He would get his ass kicked?
David Toy was an up-and-coming star at tailback in 1985. But in the second game of the year he fumbled 2-3 times against BYU. He was benched the rest of the season, and the next spring he was the backup safety.
More memories of the Mormans stealing our natty
That was in '84, not '85
No way Peterman cares about winning when DWarsh goes back out there.
How can you convince your team you're about winning when you are more worried about the confidence of a loser than winning?
DWarsh was the cause of that loss.
Pete was at the heart of that loss.
From allowing the Swede package to ruin two 1st and 10's, to keeping Dwarsh in front of Gaskin after the first fumble.
It's on Pete.
Well of course it is. I'm just saying, DWarsh was the proximal cause. Pete was the distal cause.
Pete doesn't GAF about winning.
He's in retirement mode.
No way Peterman cares about winning when DWarsh goes back out there.
How can you convince your team you're about winning when you are more worried about the confidence of a loser than winning?
DWarsh was the cause of that loss.
Pete was at the heart of that loss.
From allowing the Swede package to ruin two 1st and 10's, to keeping Dwarsh in front of Gaskin after the first fumble.
It's on Pete.
Well of course it is. I'm just saying, DWarsh was the proximal cause. Pete was the distal cause.
Pete doesn't GAF about winning.
He's in retirement mode.
He would get his ass kicked?
David Toy was an up-and-coming star at tailback in 1985. But in the second game of the year he fumbled 2-3 times against BYU. He was benched the rest of the season, and the next spring he was the backup safety.
More memories of the Mormans stealing our natty
That was in '84, not '85
Yeah but 85 is when we had a chance to beat them on the field and show we were better, but we lost instead. So it still triggers the memory of 84.