I try to ignore doogs

I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?
 
I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the season started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.
 
Last edited:
I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the season started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.
The over/under is 5 poasters, but we're all just Boobs or Harv

 
I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the season started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.

I wouldn't go that far. A lot of us said, "well they are experienced, but...."
 
I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the season started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.

I wouldn't go that far. A lot of us said, "well they are experienced, but...."

I expected it to be better. I figured they were doing something right helping Sankey gain all those yards. It's amazing that Sankey could get so many yards with this group. In the OL's defense, when they do create holes, the RB's go down after 5 or 6 yards. I don't think they are terrible, but they are average. Average with a group this experienced is really bad.
 
I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

Only at the UW do players not get better over time.
 
You really need to stop with the instant gratification and give Petersen 8 years to get his guys in here, bring Dan Cozzetto back in 3 years from now (after he's tanned, rested, and ready), and let the Cascade Front Mk. II get a few years with Socha under their belts. Then our boys will be ready to rumble.
 
I swear I do. But the one doog narrative that drives me fucking crazy is that the offensive line should be good because they are upperclassman. Ever seen a UW game over the last 3 years?

I don't even know who is a doog and who is a HB on this site (and for all I know its just 5 posters with 17 - 33 handles each), but before the past 7 seasons started, it seemed like pretty much everybody thought the OL would be a strength this year.

Fixed for historical accuracy.
 
I am DoodHIV positive, I will probably die a doog. The majority thinks we're going to be worse next year since we're losing a few big contributors to the NFL this offseason. I think if coaching is half as important as has been said previously, we should be improved next year. More details, more coaching, more Dissly.
 
Back
Top