We?re playing against Arizona that game you fucking idiot
So the "theory" only applies when Oregon and Washington are playing each other and only during the last 9 years? Why? If wearing all whites is "data" that shows a team is embarrassed about the possibility of losing that game why wouldn't that apply to all games? And why does it only cover the last 9 years? It wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that Oregon has regularly been wearing non-traditional uniforms for nearly 20 years during a time when there wasn't a chance in hell they were going to lose to UW would it haie?
Here’s another data point where Oregon wore a black uniform because they thought they were going to lose to UW in 2009:
View attachment 60787
Falls outside of the time frame haie created for his "theory." Weird how his theory doesn't cover any year when there wasn't a chance in hell that Washington was going to be within even two scores of Oregon.
That’s where I disagree with the original conspiracy on some of it’s data input.
There’s always been a big possibility of losing to the biggest brand in the conference. We’ve never taken any chances.
Or it’s that Oregon has been doing this against every team in the conference for 20 years and UW has just happened to start to win every once in a while rendering the entire UW fan base into simp puddles. No pun intended.
And his name is The Duck.
As you probably noticed haie only started putting qualifiers on the conspiracy theory after he had already put his head up his ass. His initial head up the ass claim had no limit to only when Oregon plays Washington nor was there any 10 year time frame, that conveniently was reduced to 9 years when haie recalled that Oregon beat the shit out of them in 2013 in Seattle wearing non-traditional uniforms.
Oregon waltzed into Seattle and shoved the ball down their throats in 2007 wearing all white uniforms but that doesn't fit haie's head up the ass theory so it doesn't count. Same with 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2013.