I like this thread

[Auburndawg]

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1360&t=12351023

 

[Ping]

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1360&t=12351023

TFL; DFR.

 

[HeretoBeatmyChest]

Most of us are banned so we need a play by play.

 

[TommySQC]

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=147&f=1360&t=12351023

TFL; DFR.

huh?

PING!

 

[jrjarrell4]

long story short: no talent disparity between UW vs OSU/WSU according to F3, because recruiting rankings mean nothing.

 

[CuntWaffle]

They only mean something if it benefits Sark otherwise they are worthless.

 

[greenblood]

Why don't you take your $75K Doog ass and get the fuck out of here. This isn't some place you can go and try to restore your beaten down reputation. You fucking suck and everyone hates you and your ass face.

LEAVE!

How about you say it to his face

 

[MisterEm]

I am still on timeout.

Thanks for the cliff notes.

 

[Mosster47]

Why don't you take your $75K Doog ass and get the fuck out of here. This isn't some place you can go and try to restore your beaten down reputation. You fucking suck and everyone hates you and your ass face.

LEAVE!

7-11 on Aurora meeting planned?

 

[bananasnblondes]

Oh man. F3 hits a new low digging his own grave in this thread,andkeeps coming back for more. By the end, he's arguing that UW doesn't have enough 5th year seniors to compete even though it is pointed out that they are one of the most experienced teams in the country

 

[sarktastic]

long story short: no talent disparity between UW vs OSU/WSU according to F3, because recruiting rankings mean nothing.

Yet people pay him anyway. Fuck.

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

long story short: no talent disparity between UW vs OSU/WSU according to F3, because recruiting rankings mean nothing.

So if there's no disparity because recruiting rankings mean nothing and all HS players are essentially equal, is this not a scathing review of Sark's inability to develop talent?