I found this really hard to believe

Oregon had a hell of a run. I'm a little surprised by the numbers (which make you a faggot, btw), but not that surprised.
 
Oregon had a hell of a run. I'm a little surprised by the numbers (which make you a faggot, btw), but not that surprised.

Surprised is surprised no matter the level.

Anyway. The idea that Washington is some sort of mythical college football superpower is nothing more than a glorification of the 80s by the baby boomers who infest this place and their sycophantic minions.

There was a time (around 20 years ago) where the shit talking was legit. When the message board culture exploded on all of us with its hot molten like energy while standing in the shower.

Now it’s just an arrested developmental mental disorder to believe UW in any sort of superior program.

Both programs had a legit power 15ish year run each.

The rest for both is pretty unremarkable.

 
Pump my gas, duck!

Or, as I always wanted to say on doogman, "pump Chip's ass, duck" rotfflmfatfo!!!1!
 
Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC

7q2xnfod3oe9.gif
qwxvhxo56s98.gif
iwt7v0tlj6d9.gif
 
Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC

View attachment 23533
View attachment 23534
View attachment 23535

As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.

 
I just deal in facts, Mike. I let the chips fall where they may

This is from Winsipedia on the internet so I'm sure its accurate
 
Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC

View attachment 23533
View attachment 23534
View attachment 23535

As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.

Race likes to include stats that include that undefeated season in 1916 as it reminds him of going to games with his friends that year.
 
Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC

View attachment 23533
View attachment 23534
View attachment 23535

As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.

Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.
 
Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC

View attachment 23533
View attachment 23534
View attachment 23535

As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.

Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.

You can do both at the same time.
 
Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC

View attachment 23533
View attachment 23534
View attachment 23535

As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.

Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.

You can do both at the same time.

That's what Bill Moos said

He was almost right

Too bad the window slammed shut
 
You guys know I love crushing numbers and figuring things out and sharing my findings.

All time top 10 finishes:

UW 11, OU 9

All time top 5 finishes:

UW 7, OU 5

I couldn’t believe it. I thought UW would have had a LOT more in both cases than Oregon.

Before you ask. Yes, this includes Don James and Rick Brooks.

Crushing numbers?
 
You guys know I love crushing numbers and figuring things out and sharing my findings.

All time top 10 finishes:

UW 11, OU 9

All time top 5 finishes:

UW 7, OU 5

I couldn’t believe it. I thought UW would have had a LOT more in both cases than Oregon.

Before you ask. Yes, this includes Don James and Rick Brooks.

Why are we including archaic data from pre-1994? No one cares about the leather helmet era.

 
Back
Top