Husky Jacks open thread [2021]

The head coach at Washington is the guy Kwiatkowski volunteered to take a demotion for in order to keep him on staff. There is so much about that statement that clashes with the idea of him taking a big payday to work under a guy like Sark.
 
The head coach at Washington is the guy Kwiatkowski volunteered to take a demotion for in order to keep him on staff. There is so much about that statement that clashes with the idea of him taking a big payday to work under a guy like Sark.
Click to expand...

There's some dooging going on. I'll take 2016-17 K, the one that had studs on defense to the point where you could run pass defense 100% of the time.

We've never given up 35 points under K but running teams outside of those two years made him their bitch and never needed even close to 35 points to beat us convincingly.
 
Last edited:
The head coach at Washington is the guy Kwiatkowski volunteered to take a demotion for in order to keep him on staff. There is so much about that statement that clashes with the idea of him taking a big payday to work under a guy like Sark.
Click to expand...

There's some dooging going on. I'll take 2016-17 K, the one that had studs on defense to the point where you could run pass defense 100% of the time.

We've never given up 35 points under K but running teams outside of those two years made him their bitch and never needed even close to 35 points to beat us convincingly.
Click to expand...

For the reading comprehension impaired, I didn't state or imply an opinion as to whether Kwiatkowski leaving would be a bad thing for UW (although this is clearly the case). I strictly opined as to how silly this rumor seems on its surface. If thinking that a guy who has always valued fit over pay/prestige makes no sense at a place like Sark-run Texas is dooging... I guess I'm even more confused by what that term means now than I was five minutes ago.
 
The head coach at Washington is the guy Kwiatkowski volunteered to take a demotion for in order to keep him on staff. There is so much about that statement that clashes with the idea of him taking a big payday to work under a guy like Sark.
Click to expand...

There's some dooging going on. I'll take 2016-17 K, the one that had studs on defense to the point where you could run pass defense 100% of the time.

We've never given up 35 points under K but running teams outside of those two years made him their bitch and never needed even close to 35 points to beat us convincingly.
Click to expand...

For the reading comprehension impaired, I didn't state or imply an opinion as to whether Kwiatkowski leaving would be a bad thing for UW (although this is clearly the case). I strictly opined as to how silly this rumor seems on its surface. If thinking that a guy who has always valued fit over pay/prestige makes no sense at a place like Sark-run Texas is dooging... I guess I'm even more confused by what that term means now than I was five minutes ago.
Click to expand...

Not with anything you said, just the general meltdown that's going on in all the doog channels.

I was thinking some time in between jenn throwing in the towel and UW becoming the worst college basketball team that I hoped the coaches would have a change of philosophy on defense. K going leaves no doubt that our staff looks middle of the road by even pac 12 standards now. But I don't want to watch that style of defense against Stanford, Cal, and Oregon anymore. They don't need to score 35 or more on us.
 
The head coach at Washington is the guy Kwiatkowski volunteered to take a demotion for in order to keep him on staff. There is so much about that statement that clashes with the idea of him taking a big payday to work under a guy like Sark.
Click to expand...

There's some dooging going on. I'll take 2016-17 K, the one that had studs on defense to the point where you could run pass defense 100% of the time.

We've never given up 35 points under K but running teams outside of those two years made him their bitch and never needed even close to 35 points to beat us convincingly.
Click to expand...

For the reading comprehension impaired, I didn't state or imply an opinion as to whether Kwiatkowski leaving would be a bad thing for UW (although this is clearly the case). I strictly opined as to how silly this rumor seems on its surface. If thinking that a guy who has always valued fit over pay/prestige makes no sense at a place like Sark-run Texas is dooging... I guess I'm even more confused by what that term means now than I was five minutes ago.
Click to expand...

Not with anything you said, just the general meltdown that's going on in all the doog channels.

I was thinking some time in between jenn throwing in the towel and UW becoming the worst college basketball team that I hoped the coaches would have a change of philosophy on defense. K going leaves no doubt that our staff looks middle of the road by even pac 12 standards now. But I don't want to watch that style of defense against Stanford, Cal, and Oregon anymore. They don't need to score 35 or more on us.
Click to expand...

This is true. Be patient. Run hard, and often. Don’t throw deep. Just run 8-10 yard slant patters in front of the umbrella coverage. 15 play, 8 minute drives. Limit possessions. Win 27-21. Stanford, Colorado, Oregon and Utah did this to UW in recent years. ASU under Herm would have done this to UW. I’m just tired of the grinding drives that suck your will to live. As much as I like avoiding the plunger is there a way that the UW defense can dictate anything to the opposing offense? I feel the style of play was used to negatively recruit DEs because they were asked to just hold the edge more often than not and to a lesser degree DBs recently because they didn’t play a ton of press man to man. A happy medium would be great. Beating Stanford like every other team in the league would be a great start. Play soft against the Coug, play aggressive and in your face against the Tree. Jimmy will fuck this hire up and TSIO but not necessarily because PK has left.
 
Its ok to give up 35 points if you score 56

Go ahead and gamble with pressure and one on one. If you get burned they score quick and you get the ball back

That is what Bama is these days.
 
Its ok to give up 35 points if you score 56

Go ahead and gamble with pressure and one on one. If you get burned they score quick and you get the ball back

That is what Bama is these days.
Click to expand...

Shit, I’d take 36. WOGTFO
 
Its ok to give up 35 points if you score 56

Go ahead and gamble with pressure and one on one. If you get burned they score quick and you get the ball back

That is what Bama is these days.
Click to expand...

So with Jondon’s O we’ll? Need to hold opponents to 14 points...

Let the misery continue.

I still like you guys, kinda, but no ballz is making things more depressing and my therapist says I need less depressing things in my life. Maybe I should check out the tug...?
 
I'll trade being the darling of the numbers people for football players that make football plays

West coast blue chips ain't shit baby
 
In replacing Kwat I think we need to let Gregory coach both Inside and Outside LBs and instead hire a 3rd DB coach...
Click to expand...

We only play 2.5 DL and 1.5 LBs anyways

We need a dedicated 20 yard deep Safeties coach, a dedicated outside DB coach, and a dedicated Striker/Nickel/Dime/Slot coach.

It just makes sense! Dawg Sense
 
Its ok to give up 35 points if you score 56

Go ahead and gamble with pressure and one on one. If you get burned they score quick and you get the ball back

That is what Bama is these days.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top