https://twitter.com/ChristianCaple/status/1245070012575969281
I
SHIT
Absolute proof and a reminder that 99 times out of a 100, Goliath Stomps David's ass. Peterson bet on David way too often.
We aren’t David. We put tons of guys in the NFL. When we were David, we went 12-2 and played Bama. We got worse as we got more Goliath’s (mostly overrated, low 4 star recruits). If you expect UW to out recruit Ohio State, you’re going to be forever disappointed.
Referring to game plans and play-calling, not recruiting. UW was Goliath within the Pac12 when they went 12-2, because UW clicked on both sides of the ball that season. But UW was David in comparison to Bama, Penn State and OSU where the law of averages always favored Goliath.
David = Trickery, deception, and doing the unexpected to stay in the game and maybe steal it. Think Pete's Fiesta Bowl win vs. Oklahoma. David won that one, but no other NY6 Bowl contests thereafter.[/b]
Pete won the Fiesta again in January, 2010
Beat TCU, the other big mid major program at the time. Someone will say it doesn’t count.
I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying it's useless to focus on how many guys make the NFL, how many first downs, how many yards and time of possession as bright spots when a program cannot get over the hump and win the big games it needs to win to become elite.
The 2019 Rose Bowl was not even close until the last 40 seconds where an on-side kick would have to be recovered just to have the chance at a most prayerful Hail Mary. What are the odds of those two things happening? 1 in 10,000? It's like saying the game wasn't lost until the last play of the game. Problem is that's true in every game whether the final score is 7-6 or 55-0. Technically and actually, no game in any sport is lost until the "final play" or the clock runs out, but that doesn't turn an ass-whipping into a close game.
A one score game with a minute to go is a somewhat close game. This is a dumb argument. Why do you care this much?[/b] Losing maybe your best defensive player that started as a rookie in the NFL to a QB and passing attack that threw for 50 TD’s is a big deal. Especially when he’s replaced by a FCS/WAC type of player.
Why? Because you're deluding yourself, and it's stupid. Respectable losing is losing, period. And I'm tired of the excuses and but, but, buts, year after year after year.
Impressive comebacks that fall short, whether earned by grit or allowed by the other team "letting up" are still losses. And failures.
UW had more first downs and more time of possession, too. Does that mean UW was in OSU's class? Fuck No. Because they weren't. OSU sliced through the UW's vaunted D like a hot knife through butter to a 28-3 lead in the middle of the 3rd quarter.
Look at the red lines in the ESPN probability boxes above. They don't pull those numbers out of thin air. If nothing else convinces you that UW had zero chance of winning that game at halftime, I rest my case and you can continue deluding yourself about the state of the program.
"Look at the bright side" is what losers say.