Husky Jacks open thread [2019]

I'll post here if I get a chance to Uber Urban from SEA to Montlake.

Sorry, I already tweeted him how good the public transportation in Seattle is. You can take the train straight from the airport to the stadium!
 
https://twitter.com/wilnerhotline/status/1182294914102464512

Gilmore: “Their approach is different than what you used to get out of (Petersen) from Boise State and his first couple years at Washington. He plays more to his defense, with a great deal of confidence on that side of the ball. He thinks more about complementary football.”

Huard: “The offense was problematic a season ago. I did the ASU game in 2018, and they didn’t have an offensive identity. Were they a zone running team? A gap running team? Two tight ends? It was Week Five, and that was a significant red flag. This year, when I talked to Bush (Hamdan, the offensive coordinator), there was some clarity. He said they had made the decision to play to their defense (in 2018) and lost their aggressiveness. He vowed that wouldn’t happen this year. They were going to make a concerted effort to be aggressive, and you saw some of that through the first few games.”

Burton: “I watched the film and saw some things that were concerning, and it all came to a head against Stanford.”

Huard: “They were passive, they were timid, there was no aggressiveness on either side of the ball. They were playing for Stanford to make mistakes, and Stanford was in attack mode. You saw a neutered Washington team in every phase.”
 
https://twitter.com/wilnerhotline/status/1182294914102464512

Gilmore: “Their approach is different than what you used to get out of (Petersen) from Boise State and his first couple years at Washington. He plays more to his defense, with a great deal of confidence on that side of the ball. He thinks more about complementary football.”

Huard: “The offense was problematic a season ago. I did the ASU game in 2018, and they didn’t have an offensive identity. Were they a zone running team? A gap running team? Two tight ends? It was Week Five, and that was a significant red flag. This year, when I talked to Bush (Hamdan, the offensive coordinator), there was some clarity. He said they had made the decision to play to their defense (in 2018) and lost their aggressiveness. He vowed that wouldn’t happen this year. They were going to make a concerted effort to be aggressive, and you saw some of that through the first few games.”

Burton: “I watched the film and saw some things that were concerning, and it all came to a head against Stanford.”

Huard: “They were passive, they were timid, there was no aggressiveness on either side of the ball. They were playing for Stanford to make mistakes, and Stanford was in attack mode. You saw a neutered Washington team in every phase.”

Barbarians at the gate. Pete always talks about being out of his comfort zone. So hopefully he can walk the walk in that front. Caz it is just going continue to
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/WestCoastCFB/status/1182022918814879744

Despite our broken fucktarded offense with shot receivers, Pro Football Focus has Eason graded out as the 11th best QB in the country.

Get him some fucking help and get out of his way.

No no no. Run the damn ball. Enough of this pathetic gimmicky throwing offenses. The midget wr can’t get open when an LB 50 pounds heavier is covering them (it is the match up you want, but they can’t get open)
 
https://twitter.com/WashingtonfbM/status/1181409139492184065

I laffed. But it was a sad laugh.

080w0um37510.gif
 
https://twitter.com/wilnerhotline/status/1182294914102464512

Gilmore: “Their approach is different than what you used to get out of (Petersen) from Boise State and his first couple years at Washington. He plays more to his defense, with a great deal of confidence on that side of the ball. He thinks more about complementary football.”

Huard: “The offense was problematic a season ago. I did the ASU game in 2018, and they didn’t have an offensive identity. Were they a zone running team? A gap running team? Two tight ends? It was Week Five, and that was a significant red flag. This year, when I talked to Bush (Hamdan, the offensive coordinator), there was some clarity. He said they had made the decision to play to their defense (in 2018) and lost their aggressiveness. He vowed that wouldn’t happen this year. They were going to make a concerted effort to be aggressive, and you saw some of that through the first few games.”

Burton: “I watched the film and saw some things that were concerning, and it all came to a head against Stanford.”

Huard: “They were passive, they were timid, there was no aggressiveness on either side of the ball. They were playing for Stanford to make mistakes, and Stanford was in attack mode. You saw a neutered Washington team in every phase.”

Good article. It’s such a cop out to say in 2018 we played to the defense. It’s not mutually exclusive to be good at both. I understand playing conservative and playing to the defense, but that wasn’t why we couldn’t score in the red zone and why Pete fucked up the kicking game.

I blame Pete for Henry’s woes because no kicker can have confidence being treated like that. Pete was scared to kick a FG over 30 yards last year.

Brock had a quote about if Ahmed is getting better. He is and he really didn’t get too much of a chance to get going vs Stanford. It’s not his fault that Newton came in and looked incredible. Ahmed isn’t the problem. None of the RB’s are. They are a strength.

No identity, not running the ball more, and playing scared on offense. There isn’t any trust in what anyone is doing . That’s the problem.
 
Yes Peyton Henry is the biggest thing that bugs me. Something feels off about going from the worst Kicker in the pac12 to the best kicker in the pac12 in one season?
 
Back
Top