Husky Jacks open thread [2019]

Listened to the honks because I wanted to hear Hugh light up the receivers:

- The 3 starting receivers are redundant

- Have one receiver for speed (Opera Singer/Chico/Lowe) and rotate between them

- Never take Hunter off the field

- Start Ozzy, as he was an anchor for the 4x100 and has requisite speed, has size others don’t, and he has the best hands in the room and all the starters are having drop problems

- On the pick, the CB started with inside leverage so Hunter was going to go outside, then the CB bailed at the last second so Hunter went back inside, he rounded his route instead of cutting sharp, and he didn’t fight for the ball the way he should have

- 6 definitive drops that should count as completions (2 others that were toss-ups), 4 of them on 3rd that would have been 1st down conversions and another that was a touchdown

- Eason should have ended the game with a 70-80% completion rate and a touchdown, but the senior receivers let him down and High believes lost Eason’s trust

- Use the Hawaii game to get Ozzy/Spiker/Bynum/Puka on the field and let them go, just see if they can prove that they are better than the older guys
Click to expand...

Just listened myself (why do we do this to ourselves?).

Shocked that Hugh didn’t light up the Smurf Corps even more. He hates their beta mentality and play.

Also thought he’d be more critical of Bush and Pete as it relates to Hunter not being on the field and our formations on obvious running plays and just he general lack of evolution year over year.
 
Listened to the honks because I wanted to hear Hugh light up the receivers:

- The 3 starting receivers are redundant

- Have one receiver for speed (Opera Singer/Chico/Lowe) and rotate between them

- Never take Hunter off the field

- Start Ozzy, as he was an anchor for the 4x100 and has requisite speed, has size others don’t, and he has the best hands in the room and all the starters are having drop problems

- On the pick, the CB started with inside leverage so Hunter was going to go outside, then the CB bailed at the last second so Hunter went back inside, he rounded his route instead of cutting sharp, and he didn’t fight for the ball the way he should have

- 6 definitive drops that should count as completions (2 others that were toss-ups), 4 of them on 3rd that would have been 1st down conversions and another that was a touchdown

- Eason should have ended the game with a 70-80% completion rate and a touchdown, but the senior receivers let him down and High believes lost Eason’s trust

- Use the Hawaii game to get Ozzy/Spiker/Bynum/Puka on the field and let them go, just see if they can prove that they are better than the older guys
Click to expand...

Just listened myself (why do we do this to ourselves?).

Shocked that Hugh didn’t light up the Smurf Corps even more. He hates their beta mentality and play.

Also thought he’d be more critical of Bush and Pete as it relates to Hunter not being on the field and our formations on obvious running plays and just he general lack of evolution year over year.
Click to expand...

It sure sounded to me like Millen was either still shellshocked or being REALLY careful not to burn too many bridges. He was barely containing a lot more.
 
Finish

Clean some things up

Things losers say

I mean, the kid is right but still, fuck off
 
Listened to the honks because I wanted to hear Hugh light up the receivers:

- The 3 starting receivers are redundant

- Have one receiver for speed (Opera Singer/Chico/Lowe) and rotate between them

- Never take Hunter off the field

- Start Ozzy, as he was an anchor for the 4x100 and has requisite speed, has size others don’t, and he has the best hands in the room and all the starters are having drop problems

- On the pick, the CB started with inside leverage so Hunter was going to go outside, then the CB bailed at the last second so Hunter went back inside, he rounded his route instead of cutting sharp, and he didn’t fight for the ball the way he should have

- 6 definitive drops that should count as completions (2 others that were toss-ups), 4 of them on 3rd that would have been 1st down conversions and another that was a touchdown

- Eason should have ended the game with a 70-80% completion rate and a touchdown, but the senior receivers let him down and High believes lost Eason’s trust

- Use the Hawaii game to get Ozzy/Spiker/Bynum/Puka on the field and let them go, just see if they can prove that they are better than the older guys
Click to expand...

Hugh can be a moron at times (Russell Wilson will never be a successful qb due to his height), but each of these takes is spot on
 
Pete can't learn from his past mistakes because he can't admit he made any. Always comes up with bullshit excuses as to why something didn't work. Just like a small child
Click to expand...

He holds his players to standards that he himself doesn't meet

Fucking own up and say you will make adjustments going forward, it's always someone else's fault, not very OKG
 
Hamdan looks tormented and broken. He needs a drink. I wonder if he would do things differently if he was left to his own devices and Uncle Pete wasn't a big part of the offensive philosophy.
Click to expand...

I just don't believe this. I know we can cite stuff about Pete's offense not being great other than one year, and since he's the common denominator he's reining in these otherwise gifted OCs, but I don't believe it. I think the HC can absolutely set the tone for the *kind* of offense he wants to run (see Carroll wanting to be a heavy run team with play-action chunk plays) but there's no way I think it gets to the level of detail where he's mandating the bad route concepts and route combinations that Bush uses. Or that he's forcing Huff to set the OL up to fail by forcing them to make reach blocks they can't make, etc.

The smoking gun for me is that Bush is a first-time OC who essentially spent his time training under Sark, and this offense does the kind of stupid shit that Sark would do.
 
Hamdan looks tormented and broken. He needs a drink. I wonder if he would do things differently if he was left to his own devices and Uncle Pete wasn't a big part of the offensive philosophy.
Click to expand...

I just don't believe this. I know we can cite stuff about Pete's offense not being great other than one year, and since he's the common denominator he's reining in these otherwise gifted OCs, but I don't believe it. I think the HC can absolutely set the tone for the *kind* of offense he wants to run (see Carroll wanting to be a heavy run team with play-action chunk plays) but there's no way I think it gets to the level of detail where he's mandating the bad route concepts and route combinations that Bush uses. Or that he's forcing Huff to set the OL up to fail by forcing them to make reach blocks they can't make, etc.

The smoking gun for me is that Bush is a first-time OC who essentially spent his time training under Sark, and this offense does the kind of stupid shit that Sark would do. [/b]
Click to expand...

Hamdan has spent massively more time working under Pete than under Sark.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEMhAXCuEU8

All corch speak, but I'm happy to see him stressed.
Click to expand...

At least Softy had the chops to ask him two questions, including a follow-up, as to if the young receivers have been more of a consideration to play.

But, of course, Bush deflects to Adams and then says it all depends how they execute on the field.

Which is really fucking hard when they don’t see the field.
 
Hamdan looks tormented and broken. He needs a drink. I wonder if he would do things differently if he was left to his own devices and Uncle Pete wasn't a big part of the offensive philosophy.
Click to expand...

I just don't believe this. I know we can cite stuff about Pete's offense not being great other than one year, and since he's the common denominator he's reining in these otherwise gifted OCs, but I don't believe it. I think the HC can absolutely set the tone for the *kind* of offense he wants to run (see Carroll wanting to be a heavy run team with play-action chunk plays) but there's no way I think it gets to the level of detail where he's mandating the bad route concepts and route combinations that Bush uses. Or that he's forcing Huff to set the OL up to fail by forcing them to make reach blocks they can't make, etc.

The smoking gun for me is that Bush is a first-time OC who essentially spent his time training under Sark, and this offense does the kind of stupid shit that Sark would do. [/b]
Click to expand...

Hamdan has spent massively more time working under Pete than under Sark.
Click to expand...

Not really. One year as quality control coach, one year as WR coach before being made OC/QB coach. Only QB coaching experience was under Sark, and you have to assume as the QB coach he got a lot more involved in playcalling/play design than as the WR coach under Petersen.
 
Finish

Clean some things up

Things losers say

I mean, the kid is right but still, fuck off
Click to expand...

"Losers whine about giving their best and cleaning some things up. Winners fuck the prom queen, beat fucking Cal, and do better than 1-4 in bowl games."

- Don James
 
Hamdan looks tormented and broken. He needs a drink. I wonder if he would do things differently if he was left to his own devices and Uncle Pete wasn't a big part of the offensive philosophy.
Click to expand...

I just don't believe this. I know we can cite stuff about Pete's offense not being great other than one year, and since he's the common denominator he's reining in these otherwise gifted OCs, but I don't believe it. I think the HC can absolutely set the tone for the *kind* of offense he wants to run (see Carroll wanting to be a heavy run team with play-action chunk plays) but there's no way I think it gets to the level of detail where he's mandating the bad route concepts and route combinations that Bush uses. Or that he's forcing Huff to set the OL up to fail by forcing them to make reach blocks they can't make, etc.

The smoking gun for me is that Bush is a first-time OC who essentially spent his time training under Sark, and this offense does the kind of stupid shit that Sark would do. [/b]
Click to expand...

Hamdan has spent massively more time working under Pete than under Sark.
Click to expand...

Not really. One year as quality control coach, one year as WR coach before being made OC/QB coach. Only QB coaching experience was under Sark, and you have to assume as the QB coach he got a lot more involved in playcalling/play design than as the WR coach under Petersen.
Click to expand...

You’re forgetting he played under Pete.

And a year plus as OC.

I love you but there’s no case that 12 months under Sark was a bigger influence on Bush than his like six years under Pete.
 
Bush should know about benching seniors since he was benched as a senior.
Click to expand...

What's even funnier is the 'talented' young guys are the guys BUSH recruited. You would think he would want to play them
Click to expand...
This is why I think they might not actually be any better.
 
Bush should know about benching seniors since he was benched as a senior.
Click to expand...

What's even funnier is the 'talented' young guys are the guys BUSH recruited. You would think he would want to play them
Click to expand...
This is why I think they might not actually be any better.
Click to expand...

They are better athletes than the upper class men for sure but FWIW in the small sample size we have Bynum always looks hesitant in identifying the hole in the coverage.

I think Adams would like to play the younger guys if I had to guess but I think this is more an indictment of how hard the offense is to grasp for under class men. I remember John Ross not being good in 2014 also
 
Bush should know about benching seniors since he was benched as a senior.
Click to expand...

What's even funnier is the 'talented' young guys are the guys BUSH recruited. You would think he would want to play them
Click to expand...
This is why I think they might not actually be any better.
Click to expand...

They are better athletes than the upper class men for sure but FWIW in the small sample size we have Bynum always looks hesitant in identifying the hole in the coverage.

I think Adams would like to play the younger guys if I had to guess but I think this is more an indictment of how hard the offense is to grasp for under class men. I remember John Ross not being good in 2014 also
Click to expand...
Yep Ross got moved to DB as a junior for a reason.
 
Bush should know about benching seniors since he was benched as a senior.
Click to expand...

What's even funnier is the 'talented' young guys are the guys BUSH recruited. You would think he would want to play them
Click to expand...
This is why I think they might not actually be any better.
Click to expand...

They are better athletes than the upper class men for sure but FWIW in the small sample size we have Bynum always looks hesitant in identifying the hole in the coverage.

I think Adams would like to play the younger guys if I had to guess but I think this is more an indictment of how hard the offense is to grasp for under class men. I remember John Ross not being good in 2014 also
Click to expand...
Yep Ross got moved to DB as a junior for a reason.
Click to expand...

Wasn’t that reason Peters’ suspension?

And Kelly’s injury?

And everyone else were true freshmen?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top