droski
New Fish
Also it was a great point in mentioning that the strength of our D (secondary, even with BB potentially out) matches up well with Cal.
you are 98th in the country in sacks. that doesn't sound like a good matchup to me.
Also it was a great point in mentioning that the strength of our D (secondary, even with BB potentially out) matches up well with Cal.
Also it was a great point in mentioning that the strength of our D (secondary, even with BB potentially out) matches up well with Cal.
you are 98th in the country in sacks. that doesn't sound like a good matchup to me.
Also it was a great point in mentioning that the strength of our D (secondary, even with BB potentially out) matches up well with Cal.
you are 98th in the country in sacks. that doesn't sound like a good matchup to me.
You are CAL.
HTH
Also it was a great point in mentioning that the strength of our D (secondary, even with BB potentially out) matches up well with Cal.
you are 98th in the country in sacks. that doesn't sound like a good matchup to me.
You are CAL.
HTH
Did I wake up in a world where Washington was good?
Also it was a great point in mentioning that the strength of our D (secondary, even with BB potentially out) matches up well with Cal.
you are 98th in the country in sacks. that doesn't sound like a good matchup to me.
You are CAL.
HTH
Did I wake up in a world where Washington was good?
emerging from worst period in program history
6 in a row over you
![]()
emerging from worst period in program history
6 in a row over you
![]()
hate to break it to you, but this has been among the worst periods in cal football history too, so congrats for that. difference being Washington will never be relevant again ever. you guys need to learn a little about demographics.
you are cal
emerging from worst period in program history
6 in a row over you
![]()
hate to break it to you, but this has been among the worst periods in cal football history too, so congrats for that. difference being Washington will never be relevant again ever. you guys need to learn a little about demographics.
emerging from worst period in program history
6 in a row over you
![]()
hate to break it to you, but this has been among the worst periods in cal football history too, so congrats for that. difference being Washington will never be relevant again ever. you guys need to learn a little about demographics.
emerging from worst period in program history
6 in a row over you
![]()
hate to break it to you, but this has been among the worst periods in cal football history too, so congrats for that. difference being Washington will never be relevant again ever. you guys need to learn a little about demographics.
What about these demographics? Are you beating your chest as a California superiority guy that suggests that there's no such thing as a good player developed anywhere outside of California?
Clearly you don't know much about UW football history because the program has historically been tied to recruiting the best in the State of Washington (7-12 recruits a year) combined with getting kids from California, Hawaii, and other Northwest states.
Unless you are saying that there's not going to be a population elsewhere than California, we'll be just fine. It's always been about whether or not we have had the right coach in place ... when we do, we win and win at a high level.
Don't you have another rugby national championship to go crow about anyway?
How can we tell?
Joe Kapp says hello
How can we tell?
Joe Kapp says hello
if your best example is from 35 years ago, I think I've made my point.
the point is it is easier to pinpoint the few good years than to go over all the bad years
Hope this helps
Cal sucks
What about these demographics? Are you beating your chest as a California superiority guy that suggests that there's no such thing as a good player developed anywhere outside of California?
Clearly you don't know much about UW football history because the program has historically been tied to recruiting the best in the State of Washington (7-12 recruits a year) combined with getting kids from California, Hawaii, and other Northwest states.
Unless you are saying that there's not going to be a population elsewhere than California, we'll be just fine. It's always been about whether or not we have had the right coach in place ... when we do, we win and win at a high level.
Don't you have another rugby national championship to go crow about anyway?
you won because USC and UCLA and Oregon were down and james was roiding the shit out of your players.
the point is it is easier to pinpoint the few good years than to go over all the bad years
Hope this helps
Cal sucks
you have one more pac-12 championship historically than we do. congrats.
What about these demographics? Are you beating your chest as a California superiority guy that suggests that there's no such thing as a good player developed anywhere outside of California?
Clearly you don't know much about UW football history because the program has historically been tied to recruiting the best in the State of Washington (7-12 recruits a year) combined with getting kids from California, Hawaii, and other Northwest states.
Unless you are saying that there's not going to be a population elsewhere than California, we'll be just fine. It's always been about whether or not we have had the right coach in place ... when we do, we win and win at a high level.
Don't you have another rugby national championship to go crow about anyway?
you won because USC and UCLA and Oregon were down and james was roiding the shit out of your players.
Either the Oregon part is a giant whoosh or you don't know what the fuck you're talking about ... either way, it's not interesting.
the point is it is easier to pinpoint the few good years than to go over all the bad years
Hope this helps
Cal sucks
you have one more pac-12 championship historically than we do. congrats.
Please dive off the Golden Gate Bridge asshater. Sanford reject trying to make Cal look bad?