Huskies Add Virginia Transfer to Bolster Depleted Running-Back Ranks
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
That this had zero replies until now says all we need to know about the program right now.
whatshouldicareabout
Active poster
Topic was discussed elsewhere. This is an SI article which are avoided like the plague. Hell, they don't even get a Thanks Taft! anymore
EwaDawg
New Fish
SI is hit and miss. I am pretty sure Derek posts them because Raley has some good content (sometimes).
Even if he isn't technically gifted as a writer his articles provide information that was not necessarily old news.
If you want to actually contribute here perhaps you should at least provide a link to the "discussion elsewhere".
My initial reaction is that we got a poor man's Sean McGrew. LIPO. It does tell me that deBoner is not happy with what he has at the moment.
Our current RB "stable"
Dick Newton*
Cam Davis*
Sam Adams*
Camden Sirmon
Javeon Sunday
Caleb Berry
Emeka Megwa*
Aaron Dumas
Wayne Taulapapa
Will Nixon
* = hurt
In addition, both current 2023 commits say they will play RB. I'm genuinely intrigued to see how this sorts itself out.
Dick Newton*
Cam Davis*
Sam Adams*
Camden Sirmon
Javeon Sunday
Caleb Berry
Emeka Megwa*
Aaron Dumas
Wayne Taulapapa
Will Nixon
* = hurt
In addition, both current 2023 commits say they will play RB. I'm genuinely intrigued to see how this sorts itself out.
I feel like the current running back unit strategy is akin to Infinite Monkey Theorem.
1to392831weretaken
New Fish
There's an entire recruiting forum here. You're going to make a guy give you a link to a thread about a commit when you clearly haven't even visited the recruiting forum looking for one? I think there are two threads discussing this down there.
MikeDamone
Well-known poster
Take it to the Tug
1to392831weretaken
New Fish
Last edited:
EwaDawg
New Fish
No, fuckstick. Stalin posted it on this bored.
Don't link it. Just say on the fucking recruiting bored instead of elsewhere.
But thanks for letting us know that you stalk and groom little boys.
(you might want to actually read my post that you responded to. I left it up to the OP IF he wanted to be helpful)
Last edited:
I found what he said to be helpful. If you require more spoonfeeding than that in order to not be a prick to then you might try an internet site that's a little more your level. Why should he go out of his way, to another board, just to dig up a link for your lazy, combative ass?
dOgmaster
New Fish
How do you have 10 RB’s that are mediocre at best? Folks here kept beating that drum that uw can take anyone and make them a 5*, because look at one random fucking player that exceeded expectations, cause our staff knows how to develop, while ignoring the lists of players that they didn’t develop. Like the receivers that were lauded when recruited but bashed when they transferred out because they sucked. Why didn’t Jimmy & Co. develop them?
Having 10 RB’s wouldn’t be bad if there wasn’t a schollie limit. Or if uw actually ran the ball enough to justify it.
Looking forward, who the fuck is going to commit when there is a huge log jam at that position. You get like what 4-5 carries per practice.
Not the folks here. Bonapha was garbage and he lucked out that the local kid’s mom told him to come here over ASU. Take away Gaskin’s 4 years and you have a dogshit coach.
@EwaDawg is correct. Raley isn't Hemingway and his headlines are cringe. Some articles are crap and some are decent to good. But he relentlessly post updates on thing going on.
And @1to392831weretaken indirectly makes a point in that I should have checked the recruiting board before posting the link here. Sometimes when I have a few minutes I'll do a quick scan and then find material and link it before moving on to more reading/monitoring throughout the boards. I can do a better job of that.
And @1to392831weretaken indirectly makes a point in that I should have checked the recruiting board before posting the link here. Sometimes when I have a few minutes I'll do a quick scan and then find material and link it before moving on to more reading/monitoring throughout the boards. I can do a better job of that.
EwaDawg
New Fish
Did "I" say I needed a " link"? Most people with decent cognitive ability would understand that I knew enough about this commit to actually compare him to McGrew.
Hell, I even said a comment pointing to the recruiting board would have been helpful (THIS IS THE POAST YOU RESPONDED TO).
So, a poaster with limited ability to understand what he read, decided I wanted a LINK for me?
Okay. I understand that your ability to follow a thread, logically and in order, is not very good.
The poaster to which I responded had an EQUAL INABILITY to read properly as I did not ONCE AGAIN ask for the link for me.
TLDR - I usually only respond as an asshole to idiots that deserve it.
You're welcome.
BTW, I am REALLY sorry that the HIV has won.
Last edited:
Can't we get back to talking Xs and Os[/s] Sean McGrew 2.0?
Last edited:
Convert Adams to safety, politely get rid of Fig and sCam.