gabemarksknee
New Fish
Have you watched Manu and Wellington?
Hi Marlon
- Thread starter BeerThirty
- Start date
Have you watched Manu and Wellington?
animate
New Fish
Given the situation that we appear
In the context of his family situation (as i've read it) i'm not surprised at that avoidance behavior.
This is a 17 year old kid in high school man.
Adults on a college football fansite touching the dregs of humanity (hi hardcore husky!) can't realistically expect teenagers to act like wizened adults.
yeah, I wished he followed through with UW and was anchoring this defensive line ... but it is what it is. He got caught in the middle of snake oil salesman and immigration promises and coffee cups and all that good stuff. You think a 17 year old is gonna make what we think is the "right" decision? Legally, he's not even a damn adult yet.
Marlon could have walked away from Peterman but he also chose to embrace him. I think if he could turn back the clock without restraints he would have been a Husky.
Let it go guys ... and celebrate that we have Tuli, Taki, Latu, Bandes, Tuitele, Heimuli, Paama!, Noa ... it's gonna be an awesome ride ...
In the context of his family situation (as i've read it) i'm not surprised at that avoidance behavior.
This is a 17 year old kid in high school man.
Adults on a college football fansite touching the dregs of humanity (hi hardcore husky!) can't realistically expect teenagers to act like wizened adults.
yeah, I wished he followed through with UW and was anchoring this defensive line ... but it is what it is. He got caught in the middle of snake oil salesman and immigration promises and coffee cups and all that good stuff. You think a 17 year old is gonna make what we think is the "right" decision? Legally, he's not even a damn adult yet.
Marlon could have walked away from Peterman but he also chose to embrace him. I think if he could turn back the clock without restraints he would have been a Husky.
Let it go guys ... and celebrate that we have Tuli, Taki, Latu, Bandes, Tuitele, Heimuli, Paama!, Noa ... it's gonna be an awesome ride ...
Maybe, but it’s really the offense. Offense and coaching we’re the real reason we lost against Cal. The drops were ridiculous. Defense was terrible against the run, but we still only gave up 19.
Last edited:
GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
19 ought to be enough to win at home.
We should score more than 19 against anyone. I know Cal has a good d, but it’s not that good. 19 is nothing in college football, especially with Eason and the way we ran the ball.
HuskyHalfBrain
Active poster
Offense can go DIAFF but giving up 20 to a shit Cal offense at home was not expected.
Cal scored 27 against UC Davis, 23 against North Texas and 17 against Arizona State all at Berkeley.
Fuck the coaches and offense but the defense struggled just as much especially on Cal's last drive,
Losers lose.
No arguments. The defense was really bad the whole 2nd half. I can live with Gordon’s PI and giving up a catch. I can’t live with teams running power and imposing their will. That’s why I’m still skeptical about this team. There are no reinforcements at LB and Cam Williams is a suspect tackler as the last line of defense.
Bingo. If SC commits to running power all game, it's complete coin flip we win yesterday.
By the end of year, we are going to be talking about 1 maybe 2 more games we "Cal'd" where the inability to stop the run will be our downfall. Utah is the game that comes to mind for me and maybe the Ducks as well.
