HHB Glossary of Terms

[dhdawg]

the O/U is 5 should be on there, where did that originate btw?

 

[RaceBannon]

the O/U is 5 should be on there, where did that originate btw?

Harv. We kept trying to get him to add a 1/2 but he stood by 5. It was for number of Husky wins

 

[allpurpleallgold]

the O/U is 5 should be on there, where did that originate btw?

I think it's from Condotta. There was this complete dipshit, ripty, that would always ask him the over under for UW wins in his chats and he always answered 5.

 

[CheersWestDawg]

the O/U is 5 should be on there, where did that originate btw?

I think it's from Condotta. There was this complete dipshit, ripty, that would always ask him the over under for UW wins in his chats and he always answered 5.

Fucking ripty. I hate that bastard.

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

Very informative. This place is worth every penny.

I saw no mention of " what a great day to be a _____". Seems to be a big hit here.

it's what a cool week to be a _______ man/brah
Sark said "what a cool week to be a husky" at some press conference after a win, I believe it was Arizona last year and we've recycled it filling in the blank

The "what a cool week for the Washington Huskies man!" was the 2013 season after beating Arizona, being ranked in the Top 25 and about to play Top 15 Stanford.

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

Who started the leg wrestling thing?

I thought the leg wrestling and 7-11 on Aurora in the U-District went together. Some stupid old fuck, BrentsFS maybe, poasted something saying he would Indian leg wrestle some HHB or other smart ass at the 7-11?

 

[sarktastic]

An insignificant hobby bored with 5 posters who all use aliases, has a 12 page glossary of terms?

wierd

 

[allpurpleallgold]

An insignificant hobby bored with 5 posters who all use aliases, has a 12 page glossary of terms?

wierd

That's a great soundbite but we don't all use aliases.

 

[PurpleJ]

An insignificant hobby bored with 5 posters who all use aliases, has a 12 page glossary of terms?

wierd

There are easily 6, possibly 7, posters here.

 

[Blackie]

I think the "7-11 on aurora" originated one night in chat when dug the dawg threw one of his regularly scheduled temper tantrums. Seems like there had been a few assaults at 7-11s at the time.

@TierbsHsotBoobs True?

I don't even remember how that shit started at this point.

you suck then.

it was definitely a pitism.

This.
Also, fuck off der golve.

 

[[Deleted User]]

Has friends in Portland who AGREE been added yet?

 

[CuntWaffle]

Has friends in Portland who AGREE been added yet?

You cock-eaters REALLY go too far. I read your posts to friends of mine in Portland and they think you are disgusting pigs and not very nice. ....I AGREE.

I told them you are huskie fans and that makes you assholes by association and, hence, can't help yourselves. The lot of you need to get your minds out of the gutter. I am sick and tired of making excuses for you. Fuck

(RIP dawgboard)

 

[MikeDamone]

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

 

[RaceBannon]

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one

 

[DerekJohnson]

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one

That's how I remember it as well.

 

[MikeDamone]

From the relatively short time I've spent here this is how I perceive the HH Heirarchy :
Derek Johnson - founder and benevolent dictator
Race Bannon - a well respected elder, emissary to rival forums, originator of many famous stories (like those at Autzen).
TierbsHsotBoobs - also known as Sven (I think), possible founding member or one of the original revolutionaries that started the war against Dawgman.com.
DNC, CuntWaffle, He_needs_more_time and a few others - higher ranked minions that try to keep things dialed in.

Am I very far off?

Yes, you are.

 

[RaceBannon]

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one

That's how I remember it as well.

You've always been one of my favorite posters

 

[RoadDawg55]

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one

I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.

 

[MikeDamone]

I know I'm gonna get laughed at cause I don't know but where did the rather easily, say 34-17 come from

We win rather easily, say, 34-17?

What's the story behind this one?

I thought that was already covered on the to do list for 5 reasons.

BTW, I still laugh when other fans on their sites take it seriously like Beavers fans last year.

Was that a part of 5 reasons? My memory is that they were different posts but I could be wrong. Damone should be able to clear this up.

It was part of the same one.

"1. Keith Price - He is the best player on the field, enough said on that. He has three years under his belt and he will do everything possible to win the game.

2. Offensive Line - We average a weight of 332 lbs across the line, they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Hatchie, Brostek, Dolbec, Ikehara, Schaefer, White-Frisbee, etc. These boys have the attitude and are ready to rumble.

3. Wilcox - New Defensive Scheme and a new attitude. Every player has spoke out about the difference between Holt and Wilcox, we will see a much improved defense on 9/1.

4. Speed, Speed, Speed - This is the fastest our team has been in a long time. Doeontae Cooper, Connor Cree, Cooper Pelluer, Kavario Middleton, Will Chandler, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but will bring something that we haven't had in past seasons, speed.

5. Time of Possession - I think we can dominate the time of possession stat. The more we can shorten the game and keep our defense off of the field, the better chance we have to win the game.

I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17?"

This was a variation of the original one which was said before the Oregon game in 2008.

flagged for leaving out ossai

Back in 2008, a doog poasted the original 5 reasons on why UW would beat whOregon (ROFL). I think it was also in 2008 that BundawgFS poasted before UW played Oklahoma and said "I think UW wins rather easily...say 34-17"

34-17 was for the 2008 Oregon game

Bondawg was 35-17 and he was the rather easily dude. For Oklahoma. I'll fight to the death on this one

I only read the boards back then, but I remember it being Oklahoma as well. It stuck with me because it was such a FS comment. I remember thinking how stupid it was to think a team coming off a 2 win season was beating a top 10 team on the road.

It was originally Oregon, 2008