Hey Kobe, what do you call it when the government and Big business team up...

I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.
 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

nd9dpyj0yhgt.png
 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?

Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.
 
Last edited:
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?

Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option.
 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?

Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option[/b].

See?
 
Last edited:
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?

Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option[/b].

See?

No.
 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?

Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

I think elections should be publicly funded with no outside money allowed. Within our current system, I view taking money from unions as a better option[/b].

See?

No.

We know you don't.
 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Good Christ. Have ever cracked an Econ book not written by Engels or Marx?

I do have a tangent question. You’re against citizens United, but you didn’t comment on Union political contributions. I assume you have no issue there?

Also, to answer the original question for you, that is fascism defined. And you voted for it.

Weird how Kobe has no problem voting for fascism.
 
It’s called libertarian socialism.

I'll take Oxymoron's (emphasis on moron) for 500, Alex

We literally invented it.

View attachment 47114

JFC. Of course this from a person that believes a guy who thinks he is a women is an actual woman.

And thanks for admitting (again) that you are a communist.

But as we know from TKS copy pasta from last week, he has to google shit to have any thoughts to post.
 
Last edited:
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people[/i]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision[/i]
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.
 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people[/i]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision[/i]
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.

Wow. TKS googled some shit again. Impressive.

Now do unions.
 
I call it the consequences of the action of baby boomers. The dominant voting bloc for years that allowed and encouraged things like citizens united, creating an oligarchy.

Anyone want to see a jackass dance?

Kobe, in your own words tell us how CU created an oligarchy?

is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people[/i]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision[/i]
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained

Respectful reminder Bobby, you’re dumb. Just because you can’t figure something out, doesn’t mean it’s hard to figure out.

So you couldn’t do it, and I’m dumb?
 
Back
Top