Hey Kim, zona is #12 witb 2 and 3* talent

puppylove_sugarsteel

Asshole Emeritus
Maybe Petersen's 3-4* okg's might just damn be good enough to win with. Sark's 4-5* guys sure didnt work out so hot yoh little buttsniffing wino wannabe
 
How many 5* did Sark have?

I think 3? That has always been one of the big myths. He really didn't get any more big time guys than other UW coaches.
 
Last edited:
There's a ton of 1 loss teams so if they all win out, it should come down to who has the most impressive wins.

How many 5* did Sark have?

I think 3? That has always been one of the big myths. He really didn't get any more big time guys than other UW coaches.

 
How many 5* did Sark have?

Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars on Rivals.
 
Last edited:
How many 5* did Sark have?

Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.

This.

And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.

Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.

You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.
 
How many 5* did Sark have?

Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.

This.

And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.

Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.

You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.

To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.
 
How many 5* did Sark have?

Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.

This.

And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.

Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.

You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.

To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.

To add to this, the Chris Izbicki 5-star ranking was one of the most transparent examples of ranking inflation. I still see fans of other teams who follow recruiting mention it on occasion when talking about how retarded that Scout.com is.
 
How many 5* did Sark have?

Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.

This.

And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.

Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.

You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.

To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.

To add to this, the Chris Izbicki 5-star ranking was one of the most transparent examples of ranking inflation. I still see fans of other teams who follow recruiting mention it on occasion when talking about how retarded that Scout.com is.

I know Chris a little bit and played against him. He was never anything special. A solid high school player, nothing more.

Fetters wrote articles on a kid from my high school team that was a third string TE who never caught a pass. He said the TE oozed potential. He got a two star ranking because he was 6'4" 220 and went to Barton and another regional combine and ran a 4.8.

Zach Banner was another head scratcher. He had tons of offers too. I know he was huge and had great bloodlines, but I saw a 5'10" 200 pound kid from White River dominate him all game long. The kid from White River had like 3 or 4 sacks and a handful of other QB pressures and tackles for loss. At least he had some potential and started for USC, but I was shocked he was rated for high. The #11 ranked tackle should be dominant imo.
 
How many 5* did Sark have?

Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.

This.

And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.

Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.

You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.

To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.

To add to this, the Chris Izbicki 5-star ranking was one of the most transparent examples of ranking inflation. I still see fans of other teams who follow recruiting mention it on occasion when talking about how retarded that Scout.com is.

I know Chris a little bit and played against him. He was never anything special. A solid high school player, nothing more.

Fetters wrote articles on a kid from my high school team that was a third string TE who never caught a pass. He said the TE oozed potential. He got a two star ranking because he was 6'4" 220 and went to Barton and another regional combine and ran a 4.8.

Zach Banner was another head scratcher. He had tons of offers too. I know he was huge and had great bloodlines, but I saw a 5'10" 200 pound kid from White River dominate him all game long. The kid from White River had like 3 or 4 sacks and a handful of other QB pressures and tackles for loss. At least he had some potential and started for USC, but I was shocked he was rated for high. The #11 ranked tackle should be dominant imo.

so you're like 25 years old? damn, i thought you were a wise old football veteran. #BubblePopped
 
according to Rivals pac-12 recruiting rankings Washington vs. Arizona

2010 UW 6 UA 9

2011 UW 5 UA 8 *Stoops fired. UA posts 4-8 record

2012 UW 5 UA 11 *Rich Rod hired in December, 2011. UA posts 8-5 record

2013 UW 3 UA 7

2014 UW 7 UA 6
 
Back
Top