Hey Kim, I thought Doogman didn't do editorials

That's so interesting, because when I wrote several editorials criticizing Willingham, Emmert and Woodward, I was told Dawgman didn't do editorials and they wouldn't run them. "Stick to interviewing former players," Kim said. "That's what you do well."
 
No way they would that do that type of story with sark.

Kim. I know you read this. Admit you fuckers have an agenda. Just do it already. Assholes. Fuck
 
Last edited:
was their a similar article when EWU threw for 450 against us in 2011 and we barely squeaked out a victory thanks to trufant? JW
 
It's funny because you all agree with them now.
Who does? Last I checked... the season can still be over and Peterman can still be a good coach. The two ideas aren't mutually exclusive.
 
Looks like if you're 400 lbs and the coach isn't named Willingham you can write one.

Kim is obviously concerned about the lack of sizzle in last night's game, just like @RaceBannon‌ and @MikeDamone‌ are.

New Lemon Party trio.
 
Looks like if you're 400 lbs and the coach isn't named Willingham you can write one.

Kim is obviously concerned about the lack of sizzle in last night's game, just like @RaceBannon‌ and @MikeDamone‌ are.

New Lemon Party trio.

BRB, JO

* if I wasn't lazy and drunk, I'd include photos of all 3 for effect
 
Looks like if you're 400 lbs and the coach isn't named Willingham you can write one.

Kim is obviously concerned about the lack of sizzle in last night's game, just like @RaceBannon‌ and @MikeDamone‌ are.

New Lemon Party trio.

Right except I never mentioned anything about sizzle. Paul Pressy thinks you're pressing.
 
Back
Top