Here's One Top 25 Poll That Won't Dismiss the Start-Over Huskies

Appreciate the love. Not a huge fan of mentioning that Oregon should be ranked #4 because Lanning "turned down the Alabama job." Then highlighting Dante Moore as one of the reasons they should be ranked that high when he's not gonna be the starter and was downright scary last year, and not in a good way.
Completely writing UW off as a team that can't get into somewhere say #11-25 is silly. There are plenty of Iowas and Kansas States and ACC teams every year which end up in there with not much to work with.
 
6357fb2c-f3c1-417a-b5eb-c6ebf93ee77e-text.gif


@Mad_Son
 
WoolleyDoog said:
Appreciate the love. Not a huge fan of mentioning that Oregon should be ranked #4 because Lanning "turned down the Alabama job." Then highlighting Dante Moore as one of the reasons they should be ranked that high when he's not gonna be the starter and was downright scary last year, and not in a good way.
Completely writing UW off as a team that can't get into somewhere say #11-25 is silly. There are plenty of Iowas and Kansas States and ACC teams every year which end up in there with not much to work with.
Click to expand...
If TCU was returning from the natty game with 20 starters gone and no feasible offensive linemen in March, it wouldn't be silly to not include them in your top 25.
 
DerekJohnson said:
WoolleyDoog said:
Appreciate the love. Not a huge fan of mentioning that Oregon should be ranked #4 because Lanning "turned down the Alabama job." Then highlighting Dante Moore as one of the reasons they should be ranked that high when he's not gonna be the starter and was downright scary last year, and not in a good way.
Completely writing UW off as a team that can't get into somewhere say #11-25 is silly. There are plenty of Iowas and Kansas States and ACC teams every year which end up in there with not much to work with.
Click to expand...
If TCU was returning from the natty game with 20 starters gone and no feasible offensive linemen in March, it wouldn't be silly to not include them in your top 25.
Click to expand...
Yeah but what if their coach also left?
 
Since Nacho seems to be absent, I'll take care of the DRFS trigger warning for @Mad_Son .
 
DerekJohnson said:
WoolleyDoog said:
Appreciate the love. Not a huge fan of mentioning that Oregon should be ranked #4 because Lanning "turned down the Alabama job." Then highlighting Dante Moore as one of the reasons they should be ranked that high when he's not gonna be the starter and was downright scary last year, and not in a good way.
Completely writing UW off as a team that can't get into somewhere say #11-25 is silly. There are plenty of Iowas and Kansas States and ACC teams every year which end up in there with not much to work with.
Click to expand...
If TCU was returning from the natty game with 20 starters gone and no feasible offensive linemen in March, it wouldn't be silly to not include them in your top 25.
Click to expand...
TCU is also a sisters of the poor program compared to UW. We? should be able to reload much quicker than that school.
 
BleachedAnusDawg said:
DerekJohnson said:
WoolleyDoog said:
Appreciate the love. Not a huge fan of mentioning that Oregon should be ranked #4 because Lanning "turned down the Alabama job." Then highlighting Dante Moore as one of the reasons they should be ranked that high when he's not gonna be the starter and was downright scary last year, and not in a good way.
Completely writing UW off as a team that can't get into somewhere say #11-25 is silly. There are plenty of Iowas and Kansas States and ACC teams every year which end up in there with not much to work with.
Click to expand...
If TCU was returning from the natty game with 20 starters gone and no feasible offensive linemen in March, it wouldn't be silly to not include them in your top 25.
Click to expand...
TCU is also a sisters of the poor program compared to UW. We? should be able to reload much quicker than that school.
Click to expand...
Call me a doog I just don't think the TCU and UW comparisons are fair.
 
WoolleyDoog said:
BleachedAnusDawg said:
DerekJohnson said:
WoolleyDoog said:
Appreciate the love. Not a huge fan of mentioning that Oregon should be ranked #4 because Lanning "turned down the Alabama job." Then highlighting Dante Moore as one of the reasons they should be ranked that high when he's not gonna be the starter and was downright scary last year, and not in a good way.
Completely writing UW off as a team that can't get into somewhere say #11-25 is silly. There are plenty of Iowas and Kansas States and ACC teams every year which end up in there with not much to work with.
Click to expand...
If TCU was returning from the natty game with 20 starters gone and no feasible offensive linemen in March, it wouldn't be silly to not include them in your top 25.
Click to expand...
TCU is also a sisters of the poor program compared to UW. We? should be able to reload much quicker than that school.
Click to expand...
Call me a doog I just don't think the TCU and UW comparisons are fair.
Click to expand...
nothing doog about it. UW and TCU are not in the same realm. At all.
 
UW won their fucking conference for starters.
TCU got voted into the CFP for lame reasons. And then Michigan played their worst game in years for them.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top