dnc
New Fish
Extremely relevant since everyone here likes to claim that UW was superior to Oregon. Great example.![]()
This is what it looks like when a better team beats you on your own field. But please, keeping quooking it up.
It also looks like this:
![]()
Extremely relevant since everyone here likes to claim that UW was superior to Oregon. Great example.![]()
This is what it looks like when a better team beats you on your own field. But please, keeping quooking it up.
It also looks like this:
![]()
Blaming the refs = Quooking
So Oregon was better than Rose Bowl champion Stanford in 2012, even though they lost at home to them, because it the refs fucked them and the kicker sucked and they finished #2 in the polls and wanted Bama?
Do I have that right, OBK?
The scoreboard wasn't indicative?
Same end result of season: BCS Bowl win
You lost head-to-head at home.
Advantage: Stanford
You don't lose head-to-head, not win the conference and win the lowest level BCS bowl and say you were better than a team that beat you, won the conference, and won the Rose Bowl.
This is Section14aFS, OBK.
You don't lose head-to-head, not win the conference and win the lowest level BCS bowl and say you were better than a team that beat you, won the conference, and won the Rose Bowl.
This is Section14aFS, OBK.
![]()
When you've won 10 in a row by beating a pantheon of coaches named Willingham and Sarkisian 9 of those 10 times, it's a special decade for the Ducks man.
The fact that Fat Gilby kicked your ass, and before that Slick Rick routinely shoved it right down your feces infested throats every chance he could, I probably would be popping off as a Quook fan as well because history has shown that the only time Oregon has sustained success against Washington is when Washington has dreckfests as coaches.
Same end result of season: BCS Bowl win
You lost head-to-head at home.
Advantage: Stanford
This thread delivers in a way that makes me feel a little sad inside
Same end result of season: BCS Bowl win
You lost head-to-head at home.
Advantage: Stanford
This generation of Doog fans must wonder how it feels to be able to debate that their Top 10 program is better than another Top 10 program.
Instead, crystal balls.
Same end result of season: BCS Bowl win
You lost head-to-head at home.
Advantage: Stanford
This generation of Doog fans must wonder how it feels to be able to debate that their Top 10 program is better than another Top 10 program.
Instead, crystal balls.
Don't get me wrong, I love the Duckade of Dominance.
The last 2 seasons, there hasn't been a debate with Oregon and Stanford. When you guys play Furd again this year please keep your tears in a bucket and leave outside your front porch, I'll be picking them up Saturday night or preferably Sunday morning so I have something to drink for Seahawks games.
Many people think Stanford will take a step back every year. They're one of, if not the best schools in the country academically, and can (uniquely for such a school) recruit wherever the fuck they want. Now they have a reputation as a consistent winner. They're bringing back their qb and Montgomery this year, and it appears shaw is going to utilize smaller, but more agile backs in misdirection while still claiming that they have good enough lineman to continue the power running game as a staple. How about you Quooks prove you can beat this team once again, and bounce back from an absolute ball-stomping from last year? They have a better coach as well, no fucking question about that.
Many people think Stanford will take a step back every year. They're one of, if not the best schools in the country academically, and can (uniquely for such a school) recruit wherever the fuck they want. Now they have a reputation as a consistent winner. They're bringing back their qb and Montgomery this year, and it appears shaw is going to utilize smaller, but more agile backs in misdirection while still claiming that they have good enough lineman to continue the power running game as a staple. How about you Quooks prove you can beat this team once again, and bounce back from an absolute ball-stomping from last year? They have a better coach as well, no fucking question about that.
No Murphy (the Yeti), Skov, Gardner, Gaffney, etc. They will take a step back. And I'm sure Oregon will take advantage of that to step over them.
Many people think Stanford will take a step back every year. They're one of, if not the best schools in the country academically, and can (uniquely for such a school) recruit wherever the fuck they want. Now they have a reputation as a consistent winner. They're bringing back their qb and Montgomery this year, and it appears shaw is going to utilize smaller, but more agile backs in misdirection while still claiming that they have good enough lineman to continue the power running game as a staple. How about you Quooks prove you can beat this team once again, and bounce back from an absolute ball-stomping from last year? They have a better coach as well, no fucking question about that.
No Murphy (the Yeti), Skov, Gardner, Gaffney, etc. They will take a step back. And I'm sure Oregon will take advantage of that to step over them.
They're reloading with better, more traditional football players. You know, the big kind that let a running back like Barry Sanders or even a veteran QB gash your pussy quook defense. Montgomery will cancel out With Ekpre, and the cards are reloading with talent like the number 1 tight end recruit in the country from last year.
My point is that they reload with top talent and have a much better coach. My guess is their defense takes a small step down but their offense takes a big step up. Also, they know they own your feathered clits lately too.