The San Fran game and today's game is proof the this Hawks team can't win, when it counts.
not to mention week 1, also in arizona.The San Fran game and today's game is proof the this Hawks team can't win, when it counts.
Nice cherry picking of games as always. What about the Monday Night game vs the Saints when both teams were going for the #1 seed? What about the big SNF game at home vs the 49ers?
The Seahawks have some flaws but so does every NFL team.
Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
oh right.
the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.
SF and AZ were not must win games.
HTH
oh right.
the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.
SF and AZ were not must win games.
HTH
Really ... today wasn't a must win game. Win and wrap it all up and let your starters rest next week.
SF ... winning a late season game against a division team breathing down your neck isn't must win ...
I agree ...
it's more and more noticeable that the dumbfucks from Doogman have migrated over here.
Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.
After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.
If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.
How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.
After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.
If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.
How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
If Seattle is coasting ...
Will they rest the starters next week?
If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.
Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.
Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl.
Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.
After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.
If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.
How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
If Seattle is coasting ...
Will they rest the starters next week?
If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.
Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.
Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl.
Them choking and them not winning big games is two different things.
I'm not happy they lost but to say this proves they can't win must win games is fucking stupid.
yeah they really had to win those games. They lost both and they are still in the drivers seat. Not comprehending your logic here.Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.