Hardcore Husky Podcast: The Jimmie Dougherty Emergency Podcast

DerekJohnson

DerekJohnson

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
The boys spend about 37 seconds breaking down the departure of offensive coordinator Jimmie Dougherty, before spending the next hour and 17 minutes going down all sorts of rabbit holes. It was a pretty entertaining show considering the current dismal state of the Husky Football program. Lots of laughs and bizarre analogies. Mike Damone gets a shout out from AI Pup at the beginning and multiple shout outs toward the end of the show. Enjoy!

 
AI is supposed to replace you even though it almost always reads like the guy that already got fired after multiple failed performance plans before AI ever became a thing.
 
I loved both approaches to the last apple cups in Pullman equally.

DeBoer running it down coug's throat with Talaupapa and then ZTF pretend planting the flag, and then Jedd throwing bomb after bomb like he's trying to get some 7 on 7 time in.

It's like a great movie that they remade 20 years later and the remake is also great. I can't think of one such example but still.
 
Dannen is absolutely fucking terrible and it's safe to say he's way worse than Jen. He's way worse than Moose even was as the AD at Nebraska.

Dannen hired Sprinkle. Chun wasn't going to be able to undo any of that.

Anyone that caves to Rhule like that, a clear glorified failing upward RB coach, should never be a Power 2 AD. Tulane obviously doesn't miss him.
 
haie said:
AI is supposed to replace you even though it almost always reads like the guy that already got fired after multiple failed performance plans before AI ever became a thing.
Click to expand...
Great way to put it. One way I've been thinking of it when I use it more is if it was someone you were interviewing for a job you would never fucking hire them with the answers they give or if it was someone who just started you would immediately deem them as hopeless based on their responses to shit that you ask them. But, superintelligence.
 
WoolleyDoog said:
Great way to put it. One way I've been thinking of it when I use it more is if it was someone you were interviewing for a job you would never fucking hire them with the answers they give or if it was someone who just started you would immediately deem them as hopeless based on their responses to shit that you ask them. But, superintelligence.
Click to expand...

As sideways and mind enslaved as our society is now, one thing is still clear wrt sports media content: people want to read personalities. They don't care about summarized shit. Otherwise stuff like Barstool would be out. Hell, as much as I hate him, I'm hate reading Wilner's article before I'm querying a model about the college football.

People are right to be excited about some stuff but the thing on the episode about Bonner getting 400-600 yards are some shit is just lol. Yeah, some previous California players from his area with roughly his ranking have roughly put up those numbers in the Pac 12 or something. There is no more Pac 12 though. Where does it factor in our OL for this year which I think can be very good at running the ball and was toward the end of last year as you pointed out in the Oregon game? It's cheap but also kind of useless. To me.
 
I'm excited about the team this year because of the OL. If Jedd decides to air out anyways then he'll never do anything anywhere.

You saw 4 of our OL guys celebrating the hockey game today. Water under the bridge with the older Hatchett brother. Not to spam the thread but regarding Jonah, the offense should be a lot better when the other team doesn't 100% know who it's going to.

No clue about he dline stuff but at least we kept our good DC. The thing about what conferences we're pulling from, the MW conference winner last year got absolutely bodied by our defense to the point where you doubt the talent in that conference last year. Runner up UNLV had nothing, they were all the coach (who I predicted would be good there). I don't love taking players from Sac State but at least they have been a good program recently so maybe they did/do have some guys to take.

I only have doog hope about Demond, and that hope is that him and Jedd realized that using him like a drop back passer almost exclusively was fs last year. You have to scheme guys open for him.
 
I'm curious to see if they try a different offense at all next year. I was very underwhelmed by Demond's running ability against any defense with a pulse. I would have expected him to have at least one game where it feels like a decent opponent can't stop him but that never happened.
 
haie said:
I'm excited about the team this year because of the OL. If Jedd decides to air out anyways then he'll never do anything anywhere.

You saw 4 of our OL guys celebrating the hockey game today. Water under the bridge with the older Hatchett brother. Not to spam the thread but regarding Jonah, the offense should be a lot better when the other team doesn't 100% know who it's going to.

No clue about he dline stuff but at least we kept our good DC. The thing about what conferences we're pulling from, the MW conference winner last year got absolutely bodied by our defense to the point where you doubt the talent in that conference last year. Runner up UNLV had nothing, they were all the coach (who I predicted would be good there). I don't love taking players from Sac State but at least they have been a good program recently so maybe they did/do have some guys to take.

I only have doog hope about Demond, and that hope is that him and Jedd realized that using him like a drop back passer almost exclusively was fs last year. You have to scheme guys open for him.
Click to expand...
Agree that the reason to doog is a tougher and more developed team up front.

Fisch has gotten guys to develop elsewhere. Defense will be as good or better. The DC knows what he’s doing and we have some really good players at LB and DB. Some questions for sure, but nowhere looks truly incompetent.

We will be pretty good. Hopefully that pretty good isn’t 7-5 or 8-4.
 
DerekJohnson said:
I also compared this schedule to the '97 Huskies who started 7-1 and finished 8-4
Click to expand...
Starting 7-1 wouldn't be remarkable. You can still lose at USC, when your winnable home games and then beat Purdue and Nebraska on the road, who both might be about as good as Maryland was last year, and very possibly worse.

It's hairy from there - Penn State I assume still has good talent and now a try hard coach, at Michigan State is a classic Judd road meltown, I think Indiana could easily still be one of the best teams in the nation, and UW's chance to beat Oregon was 2025 in Seattle not 2026 in Eugene.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top