https://twitter.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1507088502059675649?s=20&t=Kk3DFmIS1jML1Kps2hxS5g
No, really. Tell us another funny.
No, really. Tell us another funny.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Ah.....HAHAHAHAHAHA
- Thread starter PurpleThrobber
- Start date
MikeDamone
Well-known poster
If they state it, it's a fact.
Cohen couldn't even name 98% of the other nominees in history, but knows that Jackson is one of the very best in history
When you don't believe the 14th amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits race discrimination, you can't read and you are not qualified. However, leftards lie and love to be lied to.
Earlier this month, the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act was celebrated. During the act's legislative debate, then-Sen. Hubert Humphrey, responding to predictions, promised, "I'll eat my hat if this leads to racial quotas."
SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]
(a) Employer practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
=========
(j) Preferential treatment not to be granted on account of existing number or percentage imbalance
Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be interpreted to require any employer[/b], employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee subject to this subchapter to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group because of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such individual or group on account of an imbalance which may exist with respect to the total number or percentage of persons of any race, color, religion, sex, or national origin employed by any employer[/b], referred or classified for employment by any employment agency or labor organization, admitted to membership or classified by any labor organization, or admitted to, or employed in, any apprenticeship or other training program, in comparison with the total number or percentage of persons of such race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in any community, State, section, or other area, or in the available work force in any community, State, section, or other area.
Earlier this month, the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act was celebrated. During the act's legislative debate, then-Sen. Hubert Humphrey, responding to predictions, promised, "I'll eat my hat if this leads to racial quotas."
SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]
(a) Employer practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
=========
(j) Preferential treatment not to be granted on account of existing number or percentage imbalance
Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be interpreted to require any employer[/b], employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee subject to this subchapter to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group because of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such individual or group on account of an imbalance which may exist with respect to the total number or percentage of persons of any race, color, religion, sex, or national origin employed by any employer[/b], referred or classified for employment by any employment agency or labor organization, admitted to membership or classified by any labor organization, or admitted to, or employed in, any apprenticeship or other training program, in comparison with the total number or percentage of persons of such race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in any community, State, section, or other area, or in the available work force in any community, State, section, or other area.
Pitchfork51
Active poster
I don't really care about this one. Dems have the votes. It's just grandstanding nonsense
This is what is normal and classy. They have the votes, the Reps know it, but they are doing what has been done for two centuries, questioning the nominee.
What the left assholes did to Kavanaugh and the woman after him was inhumane. We should be celebrating the classiness the Reps are treating this liberal piece of shit who seems to think pedophilia is a jaywalking ticket and as we will soon find out, that the constitution is nothing but butt wipe.
Pitchfork51
Active poster
Or just move on to getting drunk and trying to bone hot chicks
Democrats in purple districts still have voters to answer to this November.
Pitchfork51
Active poster
I always thought Avril Lavigne was super hot
Pretty solid sex tape, too.
Pitchfork51
Active poster
Oh shit really
Already pushed the recent movie, "The Outpost". Well done, and represents all the waste of young Americans for nothing. The dementia patients phucked up exit was the icing on the cake.
