Guliani is backtracking

Ok...where to start. I guess I'll start with our resident short-bus passenger:

1) Never watch O'Reilly...can't stand the guy. Only thing I can tolerate on Fox New is Special Report, and I've probably watched it twice in the last 6 months. But thank you for at least admitting to being a lemming and therefore assuming others must be as well.

2) Back to the straw man argument...'give me one policy that's resulted in the debt going up $8 TRILLION dollars in the last 6 years, and if you can't then somehow, someway the Fracking President of the United States isn't responsible for anything'. *Gurgle*. Its amazing... And i still can't figure out where you are confused...its common knowledge (i.e. you can look up any website that maintain debt numbers to find them) that the debt went up $4.9 trillion under Bush over 8 years, and has gone up $8 trillion and counting for Obama over the last 6 years. Are you still disagreeing with reality, or trying to *gurgle* the truth away? You know the President has signed every spending bill each year that has gone through Congress, right? Maybe you don't...its a running guess as to what you might and might not know.

3) I know it may be hard to understand for someone like yourself, but just because you can't think on your own it doesn't mean others can't. There was plenty to rip on Bush when he was President...and I did on some if you ever read the old Unleashed boards (the drug plan was stupid with the budget the way it was, along with mailing checks to people to try and boost the economy...both FS ideas). Yet it is amazing how flexible you are in bending over and taking any and all things Obama. It would be comical if it wasn't so pitiful...

 
1) O'Reilly is the same as your news source.

2) yes those are facts the debt went up that much. But let's look at why. Part of it is from additional tax cuts and the stimulus package, we are about a trillion in spending there. The rest is from the wars (which is partially him for extending them for so long), reduced revenues from the recession, and increased welfare from the recession. The recession started a full year before he was elected. I dont stroke Obama, I just dont make up shit and pretend all of the $8 trillion is on Obama. That's just FS.

3) yes and those things you rip Bush on, carried over to Obama. So you remember losing 800k jobs a month? The TARP bailout? Or just expect Obama to fix that on day 1.

The funny part is watching videos of the same news sources blasting Obama got the debt and recession in 2009 and then blaming the recession in 2001 on Clinton. Even tho it started well into Bush's term. That's my point. You parrot right wing talking points.
 
1) *gurgle*.. *slurp*...*gurgle*. I think we've already shown you have no clue how to understand even the most basic of news sources including govt data (O'Reilly is now = to govt data...you should tell him and make his ego even bigger)...

2) So you (finally) agree its reality, but now its just not 'fair'. How liberal of you. He's the President...he can cancel/expand/add programs as he sees fit as he has in working with Congress (go look at the tab for Obamacare with the "taxes" that pay for it now being pushed out/repealed/etc...funny how your 501c fails to mention that...and its only going to climb). In addition, the economy should be booming as was beaten through your weak talking points in a previous thread. It hasn't because of his policies, so govt revenues haven't grown like they should. *Gurgle* and *slurp* away as you keep apologizing for it and explaining it away...

3) Really? We are still sending one-time checks out to people? Effin moron. And Obama quadrupled down on the medicare drug benefit with that ACA, but its great for Obama and bad for Bush. And yes, its been 6 YEARS, yet we are still running half a trillion $ deficits a year. Lemming.

Its truly is amazing you keep hitting reply...
 
1) *gurgle*.. *slurp*...*gurgle*. I think we've already shown you have no clue how to understand even the most basic of news sources including govt data (O'Reilly is now = to govt data...you should tell him and make his ego even bigger)...

2) So you (finally) agree its reality, but now its just not 'fair'. How liberal of you. He's the President...he can cancel/expand/add programs as he sees fit as he has in working with Congress (go look at the tab for Obamacare with the "taxes" that pay for it now being pushed out/repealed/etc...funny how your 501c fails to mention that...and its only going to climb). In addition, the economy should be booming as was beaten through your weak talking points in a previous thread. It hasn't because of his policies, so govt revenues haven't grown like they should. *Gurgle* and *slurp* away as you keep apologizing for it and explaining it away...

3) Really? We are still sending one-time checks out to people? Effin moron. And Obama quadrupled down on the medicare drug benefit with that ACA, but its great for Obama and bad for Bush. And yes, its been 6 YEARS, yet we are still running half a trillion $ deficits a year. Lemming.

Its truly is amazing you keep hitting reply...
Click to expand...

8 years into Bush and we ran a $1.5 trillion deficit. What's your point? Even Romney said 2020 was the best case for a balanced budget.

It would be nice if you skipped backed into reality.
 
wZR2op6.gif
 
Through a bail-out...i.e. a one-time spending event. Obama institutionalized the spending. And Bush spent way too much...I'm not arguing he didn't. His debt is just half of what Obama's spent.

I've seen walls more enlightened then you. Keep *Gurgling*.
 
Through a bail-out...i.e. a one-time spending event. Obama institutionalized the spending. And Bush spent way too much...I'm not arguing he didn't. His debt is just half of what Obama's spent.

I've seen walls more enlightened then you. Keep *Gurgling*.
Click to expand...

And Bush sending checks directly to people didn't institutionalize spending? At least Obama made people work for their money.
 
Through a bail-out...i.e. a one-time spending event. Obama institutionalized the spending. And Bush spent way too much...I'm not arguing he didn't. His debt is just half of what Obama's spent.

I've seen walls more enlightened then you. Keep *Gurgling*.
Click to expand...

And Bush sending checks directly to people didn't institutionalize spending? At least Obama made people work for their money.
Click to expand...

Every time I think we've hit rock bottom on your intelligence you prove it goes even lower with a gem like this...

Do you have a clue what you are talking about? The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 was a one-time "tax rebate" that in essence was the IRS mailing a check out to everybody ONLY ONE TIME. Institutionalizing means growing government bureaucracy and permanent programs (i.e. years and years of spending). And I'm glad you think all the folks with Obama-phones are "working" for their free money.

God I hope you aren't a UW grad...
 
Last edited:
Through a bail-out...i.e. a one-time spending event. Obama institutionalized the spending. And Bush spent way too much...I'm not arguing he didn't. His debt is just half of what Obama's spent.

I've seen walls more enlightened then you. Keep *Gurgling*.
Click to expand...

And Bush sending checks directly to people didn't institutionalize spending? At least Obama made people work for their money.
Click to expand...

Every time I think we've hit rock bottom on your intelligence you prove it goes even lower with a gem like this...

Do you have a clue what you are talking about? The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 was a one-time "tax rebate" that in essence was the IRS mailing a check out to everybody ONLY ONE TIME. Institutionalizing means growing government bureaucracy and permanent programs (i.e. years and years of spending). And I'm glad you think all the folks with Obama-phones are "working" for their free money.

God I hope you aren't a UW grad...
Click to expand...

Only 2008? Yes I'm the stupid one.
http://m.sfgate.com/politics/article/Bush-signs-1-3-trillion-tax-cut-bill-300-600-2913184.php

Bush did that more than once.... And from 2001 to 2008, I think that qualifies as "years and years".

Dont you mean the Bush phone?
http://www.freegovernmentcellphones.net/faq/obama-phone

It's very clear from multiple sources that the free cell phone program started before Obama was elected.

I do chuckle when the person who calls others stupid has multiple factually incorrect statements.

Great job parroting Bill O'Reilly. You must be proud.
 
Last edited:
Is this a douchenozzle contest between Barack and Rudy?

Obama wins rather easily........................say 34-17?

Rudy's still 3 scores worth of douchenozzle, though, so it wouldn't be a bad idea for him to just stfu.

 
And even lower...although it appears you at least discovered Google.

Yeah, institutionalize spending is the same as mailing a one-time check (you know, the topic brought up which you ignored), or a tax cut with a gimmick ending date (although you don't seem to mind those when it relates to the ACA and gimmick far-off taxes that will never happen...).

And the spending on the Lifeline phones was something like $800 million in 2008. Its now $2.2 billion. Hence the name "Obamaphone". Hence the anger by some of being a perfectly good example of institutionalizing increased spending under Obama. Hence more pie in your face and yet another topic that went straight over your head.

You really aren't good at this...

I'm bored and have some other things pulling my time. So feel free to have the last post. I'm sure it will be another raging example of your exemplary intellect...
 
Obama will indeed go down as the worst president in modern history. Nice job with the veto on the Keystone Pipeline today. If you think that is a victory for the environment and public safety, you are very naive. I am a big fan of the environment, but also good quality blue collar jobs associated with the construction of a project of this size

On the other side, if you think the greasy Italian from NYC is a real or true conservative, you need to do some research. Let me know what you come up with
 
And even lower...although it appears you at least discovered Google.

Yeah, institutionalize spending is the same as mailing a one-time check (you know, the topic brought up which you ignored), or a tax cut with a gimmick ending date (although you don't seem to mind those when it relates to the ACA and gimmick far-off taxes that will never happen...).

And the spending on the Lifeline phones was something like $800 million in 2008. Its now $2.2 billion. Hence the name "Obamaphone". Hence the anger by some of being a perfectly good example of institutionalizing increased spending under Obama. Hence more pie in your face and yet another topic that went straight over your head.

You really aren't good at this...

I'm bored and have some other things pulling my time. So feel free to have the last post. I'm sure it will be another raging example of your exemplary intellect...
Click to expand...

Except you clearly didn't read my post. Here's my point. There's no difference between Republicans and democrats.

But keep parroting conservative talking points, the crowd on this site sure digs it.
 
What he said was Obama doesn't love America like you and I love America. And I can't speak for
Is this a douchenozzle contest between Barack and Rudy?

Obama wins rather easily........................say 34-17?

Rudy's still 3 scores worth of douchenozzle, though, so it wouldn't be a bad idea for him to just stfu.
Click to expand...

Overplay Barack to the left and he can't do shit. Homeboy can't cross over worth a damn and has no range on his J. Dude probably plays zone in pickup games too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top