Guliani is backtracking

2001400ex

2001400ex

New Fish
Water is wet.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/giuliani-clarifies-obama-doesn-t-love-america-150640320.html

“My blunt language suggesting that the president doesn’t love America notwithstanding, I didn’t intend to question President Obama’s motives or the content of his heart,” Giuliani writes in an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal Sunday night. “My intended focus really was the effect his words and his actions have on the morale of the country, and how that effect may damage his performance.”
 
The guy is a total POS.....but a helluva job trying to make himself relevant again....I'll give him that.
 
Obama ever apologize for questioning Bush's patriotism? I'm sure you'll be on the case.

No clue on what Obama loves, but I know one thing you love...and it involves Obama and a set of kneepads...

 
Obama ever apologize for questioning Bush's patriotism? I'm sure you'll be on the case.

No clue on what Obama loves, but I know one thing you love...and it involves Obama and a set of kneepads...
Click to expand...

Got a link for that?
 
Wow really? Yes what he said was exactly like what Guliani said. BTW, bush added way more than $4 trillion, but you knew that.
 
The 'I know you are but what am I response'. More brilliant commentary from the mental midget.

Keep using your kneepads...you really need them with your obsession with Obama...and you dig up the debt numbers yet? You'll have to start gurgling a different tune to try and explain that one away...
 
So now Bush is really in charge when Obama's president, but can't mention Clinton about things like the rise of AQ (and those costs) for Bush. And the Economy and revenues are fixed no matter what the policy or person in charge is. Rihht... Etc....etc....keep *gurgling*.

Simple fact...debt went up $4.9 trillion under Bush in 8 years, and has gone up almost $8 trillion under Obama in 6. He's in charge now...he doesn't like a policy he's had more than enough time to change it (hell...he's ignored Congress for most things).

Keep trying to *gurgle* away.
 
So now Bush is really in charge when Obama's president, but can't mention Clinton about things like the rise of AQ (and those costs) for Bush. And the Economy and revenues are fixed no matter what the policy or person in charge is. Rihht... Etc....etc....keep *gurgling*.

Simple fact...debt went up $4.9 trillion under Bush in 8 years, and has gone up almost $8 trillion under Obama in 6. He's in charge now...he doesn't like a policy he's had more than enough time to change it (hell...he's ignored Congress for most things).

Keep trying to *gurgle* away.
Click to expand...

Did you read the article? It clearly stopped Bush's debt at 2009.

You are so blindly in love with Republicans that you can't see facts right in front of your face.
 
The article? All the numbers are "analysis" from cbpp....a Liberal 501c org.

And you eat it up as "news". Lemming.
Click to expand...

Just like you eat up O'Reilly and fox news as news.

Ok. Let's go here. You said Obama " spent " $8 trillion. Show new your source on his actions that led him to spending that much.
 
The internet provides facts for any debate now. There are articles that provide facts the earth is 5,000 years old and dinosaurs never existed.

Any argument you want to make can be backed up by the internet. Just google it.
 
There even a website that says Houston husky doesn't actually blindly believe all conservative talking points. Crazy, I know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top