Does this year count?
We'll see. A lot can change in a year. I don't think we will be much, if any better next year, but by year 3 I expect a championship contender.
The game is at home next year, and Oregon won't have Mariota, but after 11 in a row, predicting a win is bold. At this point, I will believe UW can beat Oregon when I see it.
We'll see. A lot can change in a year. I don't think we will be much, if any better next year, but by year 3 I expect a championship contender.
The game is at home next year, and Oregon won't have Mariota, but after 11 in a row, predicting a win is bold. At this point, I will believe UW can beat Oregon when I see it.
...for Petersen to get UW to the point that they can compete with Oregon. Agree or disagree?
Interestingly enough, no theories from him on why the roster is in the shape that it's in.
...for Petersen to get UW to the point that they can compete with Oregon. Agree or disagree?
Interestingly enough, no theories from him on why the roster is in the shape that it's in.
Remind me again when Sark was competitive against Oregon.
It is bold, but you have an adult in charge now, while Oregon could potentially start dropping off. It also looks like we're seeing Stanford's decline starting to gain steam too.
2016 is Pete's year 3 and we know that with a new coach it happens by year 3.
Grinolds posted this in response to someone else posting a talk they had with a former UW player who essentially said that it would take CP 3 years to build the program due to the shitty way Sark ran it. The way Grinolds stated "If I would have told all of you it would be another 3 years, how many of you would have gone crazy?", he was insinuating that if Sark had stayed, UW would be a national title contender this year, but since everyone wanted him gone, you all are stuck with rebuilding again.
Grinolds posted this in response to someone else posting a talk they had with a former UW player who essentially said that it would take CP 3 years to build the program due to the shitty way Sark ran it. The way Grinolds stated "If I would have told all of you it would be another 3 years, how many of you would have gone crazy?", he was insinuating that if Sark had stayed, UW would be a national title contender this year, but since everyone wanted him gone, you all are stuck with rebuilding again.
let's just put this way, if Sark is at USC in another 3 years I'll be stunned... no way in hell he has UW in contention for a Pac12 championship regardless of how much tim he had here.
Who said Haden ' s job is secure?Grinolds posted this in response to someone else posting a talk they had with a former UW player who essentially said that it would take CP 3 years to build the program due to the shitty way Sark ran it. The way Grinolds stated "If I would have told all of you it would be another 3 years, how many of you would have gone crazy?", he was insinuating that if Sark had stayed, UW would be a national title contender this year, but since everyone wanted him gone, you all are stuck with rebuilding again.
let's just put this way, if Sark is at USC in another 3 years I'll be stunned... no way in hell he has UW in contention for a Pac12 championship regardless of how much tim he had here.
Sark is going to win enough that it will be difficult for Haden to justify firing him, especially since Sark is Haden's hire.