I agree with you. Trying to define and restrict what qualifies as R&R is not something your average, layman listener (like me) should be attempting. Rock musicians branched out and integrated other genres to creat sub genres of rock. Rock in it's origin was already a mix of genres and it only grew in the 60s and 70s, hell even the 80s.With all due respect, you couldn't possibly be more off the mark.I think Bobby D is straight folk, not even folk rock. Neil Young may have a case for rock like Pink Floyd may have a case for rock, but still. I don't consider either real rockers.You may surprised to learn that "rock" is a very broad genre and includes such sub genres as: folk rock, country rock, roots rock, blue rock, hard rock, heavy metal, southern rock, etc. So yes Neil Young and Bob Dylan are rock musicians.If Neil Young and Bobby D are considered rock alongside Metallica and AC/DC, I don't know what's happening.
If Skynyrd and/or CCR were on the list, my vote may change, but many of my formative teenage years were performed under the AC/DC and Metallica banner. Also Slayer. AC/DC gets the nod for pure rock and roll. I like the fact that 3 Bon Scott albums and the one great Brian Johnson album were included. That's the correct listing. Bon Scott >>> Brian Johnson all day, but I can't argue with Back in Black. It was great and it was meaningful. What a comeback that album was. The story behind it as well.
AC/DC! Oy! Oy!
Skynyrd's 3rd and 4th albums aren't all time classic stuff, so they don't make the cut IMO.
I can, however, make a case for CCR being in the pole.
I love Neil Young, Bob Dylan, and Pink Floyd. Not meant to be a slight on any of them.
When Dylan plugged in and "went electric" he was no longer a straight folk artist. It was only one of the biggest outrages of the mid 60s.
Bringing it Back Home, Highway 61 Revisited, and Blonde on Blonde all had rock and roll on them.
@chuck care to weigh in?