Great Lake 92% Frozen. Global Warming Strikes Again.

Great comeback. You've had 27 threads to come up with an answer and still have nothing

Burn wood
 
"Sark is 7-6, 7-6, and 7-6 but there's no consensus he's a bad coach!"

Fucking doog.
 
"Those half brains don't care about Husky Football they just have an anti Sark agenda!"

Doogie doog doog
 
Awesome work here. This is what you get when you ask a question of the "smart" folks like collegedoog and deep purple. Once they get off script its straight to the name calling and attacks.
 
Awesome work here. This is what you get when you ask a question of the "smart" folks like collegedoog and deep purple. Once they get off script its straight to the name calling and attacks.
Click to expand...

"lol"
 
I like watching stupid Californians' homes slide into ditches. Build on a mud cliff, then act surprised when it collapses. Guess I'm a dick. Don't care.
 
I like watching stupid Californians' homes slide into ditches. Build on a mud cliff, then act surprised when it collapses. Guess I'm a dick. Don't care.
Click to expand...
ThereAreMultipleDicks
 
Nobody has ever (to my knowledge) put a percentage on the effect humans have on climate change (yeah, it's very complicated, we get it, but put out a hypothesis ). Is it two percent? Five? 25? If scientists put a percentage on it, more people/politicians would take it seriously.
 
Nobody has ever (to my knowledge) put a percentage on the effect humans have on climate change (yeah, it's very complicated, we get it, but put out a hypothesis ). Is it two percent? Five? 25? If scientists put a percentage on it, more people/politicians would take it seriously.
Click to expand...

You also need a CBA on what if anything can reverse that mysterious percentage so a rational debate can be had. These guys are really no different than faith believers in their approach. We have to believe or die
 
Nobody has ever (to my knowledge) put a percentage on the effect humans have on climate change (yeah, it's very complicated, we get it, but put out a hypothesis ). Is it two percent? Five? 25? If scientists put a percentage on it, more people/politicians would take it seriously.
Click to expand...

You also need a CBA on what if anything can reverse that mysterious percentage so a rational debate can be had. These guys are really no different than faith believers in their approach. We have to believe or die
Click to expand...

I like to equate rational belief in the scientific process with the ramblings of old codgers in cassocks, I do that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top