Tequilla
Active poster
Pretty sure those are seats allocated to the Ohio State athletic department
Good thing Husky Nation will show up for the big games at good time of day
- Thread starter godawgst
- Start date
Miley_Cyrus
New Fish
Our win probability at that point was basically a coin flip and slightly in our favor… so yes? UW was controlling the game and had a 2:1 time of possession advantage. I just don’t at all agree that UW was only winning that game with trickery, that’s defeatist and not really reflective of how the game was playing out.
Vols sorry for flopping despite massive fan turnout
But, but, but, but we don't care enough as Ohio State to make sure our stadium doesn't have a bunch of opposing fans. Oh, totally forgot about this. Reported about 30% of the first ever PLAYOFF game in shoe was Tennessee fans and I forgot watching that and that being a big story.
When jack wipe fans want to "take over your stadium" they're going to. Online ticketing has changed a lot.
But, but, but, but we don't care enough as Ohio State to make sure our stadium doesn't have a bunch of opposing fans. Oh, totally forgot about this. Reported about 30% of the first ever PLAYOFF game in shoe was Tennessee fans and I forgot watching that and that being a big story.
When jack wipe fans want to "take over your stadium" they're going to. Online ticketing has changed a lot.
LMFAO at win probability in a game you? lost by 3 scores. What happened in real life? What needed to happen differently for the outcome to change? Every doog is pimping how UW could play Ohio State straight up, and it was a yawn fest of a game UW had ZERO chance of winning exactly because they played "straight up".Our win probability at that point was basically a coin flip and slightly in our favor… so yes? UW was controlling the game and had a 2:1 time of possession advantage. I just don’t at all agree that UW was only winning that game with trickery, that’s defeatist and not really reflective of how the game was playing out.
You're basically saying you should throw a checkdown for 20 yards instead of an INT in the endzone on a hail mary with no time left on the clock. The ONLY WAY UW had a chance to win was by doing crazy shit. It's not hard to comprehend unless you're a stupid fucking doog.
Last edited:
Day knew the only way Buck loses was to unleash his young QB in a hostile environment. The play calling was as vanilla as it gets. Just don't fuck up with bad turnovers, grind out a couple TDs, and head back to Columbus.
Neuheisel was lauding Day for this gameplan. Day is finally learning to just win rather trying to win a particular way (e.g., forcing the run against Michigan last year).
Dawgs showed heart. It was close to being close. Signed, Auburndoog
Neuheisel was lauding Day for this gameplan. Day is finally learning to just win rather trying to win a particular way (e.g., forcing the run against Michigan last year).
Dawgs showed heart. It was close to being close. Signed, Auburndoog
Moving the student section meant more seats available between the goalposts. Every season ticket holder benefitted from the move. The result is you get more opposing fans between the goalposts, whereas in the old configuration the majority were relegated to the horseshoe.
Last edited:
Nothing about Saturday was a real problem until Jedd and his coaches couldn't even have fucking High School volunteer coach discipline and killed an entire drive at the beginning of the game.
Okay, the Duck humorless analysis has run its course here.
Their three biggest plays btw bro were a middle screen on third and long, a play action bootleg screen on third and four and a play action fourth down pass.
Miley_Cyrus
New Fish
Jesus Tittyfucking Christ. UW WAS playing them straight up and DID have a ~50% chance of winning at the exact moment Jedd called the fake field goal. Your post is hard to comprehend because it doesn’t make any fucking sense and isn’t true.LMFAO at win probability in a game you? lost by 3 scores. What happened in real life? What needed to happen differently for the outcome to change? Every doog is pimping how UW could play Ohio State straight up, and it was a yawn fest of a game UW had ZERO chance of winning exactly because they played "straight up".Our win probability at that point was basically a coin flip and slightly in our favor… so yes? UW was controlling the game and had a 2:1 time of possession advantage. I just don’t at all agree that UW was only winning that game with trickery, that’s defeatist and not really reflective of how the game was playing out.
You're basically saying you should throw a checkdown for 20 yards instead of an INT in the endzone on a hail mary with no time left on the clock. The ONLY WAY UW had a chance to win was by doing crazy shit. It's not hard to comprehend unless you're a stupid fucking doog.
@Miley_Cyrus
You're a dim bulb, that's for sure. UW had to take chances and not play them "straight up". You think a fucking FG attempt there makes a difference in the game because some formula said there was a 50% chance to win the game at that point? Newflash dumbass, there was never a 50% chance.
You're a dim bulb, that's for sure. UW had to take chances and not play them "straight up". You think a fucking FG attempt there makes a difference in the game because some formula said there was a 50% chance to win the game at that point? Newflash dumbass, there was never a 50% chance.
Miley_Cyrus
New Fish
Yes, I do believe it made a difference in the game, and no I don’t think UW needed to take chances like that because that’s not how the game was playing out. Next
Pretty sure the actual outcome of the game dictates that there was not a 50% chance. hth. And again, do you think a FGA there changes the outcome? No, you don't.
Miley_Cyrus
New Fish
The key to beating Miami was to jump them early and not let Dorothy do shit for 30 minutes while building a big enough lead to withstand the inevitable comeback by the superior team
Ohio State handed UW a 14-0 lead. UW said thanks anyway but no
Ohio State handed UW a 14-0 lead. UW said thanks anyway but no
can we bring back the refugee and then let these two have a two man circle jerk over there and keep it off the main boreds?
creepycoug
Well-known poster
One among other things with which this board struggles is the notion that multiple things can be true at the same time. Like I can say Demond is short and still think he's a good/great QB. This and that, all at once.
Consider:
- There were similarities to Miami in that both had a green QB on the road at Husky Stadium for their first big road test.
- But beardo played it smart by calling an incredibly conservative game, and that without the running game he had a year ago. Just sayin, kid looked like Joe Montana out there dinking and dunking. Butch Davis, a program rebuilder and recruiter but not a great game day coach, did not do that.
- 2000 UW was different than these guys and Rick was different than this guy. IMO. Tui was made of different stuff. No Stevens, no road grader O line, no nasty D line, no Vontoure.
- Lots of outmanned teams jump on an better opponent and the better opponent eventually settles in so it never really matters. I mean, even Oregon started out well against Buck in 2014/15, scoring first and holding them on their first drive. Mariota hits a wide open somebody who would have walked in to score but he dropped the pass. Then Buck started scoring and never stopped. It's fun to say, "We would have been up 14-0" and had momentum but they were never going to win that game.
- Still, 2025 Buck is not in the same hemisphere as 2014/15 Buck and this team is more beatable. So, yeah, your "odds" are ostensibly better when you don't fuck up. That's basic and nobody needs that explained to them. But UW was probably not going to win that game. I predicted they would because nothing surprises me and I thought Demond might light them up on the ground at least. But Buck beat UW playing a very safe game. That's the tell. Play them later and might get ugly.
Last edited: