sarktastic
New Fish
Some of you need to stop your sniveling.
I remember when this board had standards for coaches.....it was only 9 months ago.
If Sark was here you would be burning him at the stake. Petersen has f-ed up calls late in games twice.....inexcusable for the salary he is making.
I remember when this board had standards for coaches.....it was only 9 months ago.
If Sark was here you would be burning him at the stake. Petersen has f-ed up calls late in games twice.....inexcusable for the salary he is making.
Don't you have some UW basketball to talk about?
I remember when this board had standards for coaches.....it was only 9 months ago.
If Sark was here you would be burning him at the stake. Petersen has f-ed up calls late in games twice.....inexcusable for the salary he is making.
Thought you ran your car off the I5 bridge?
I remember when this board had standards for coaches.....it was only 9 months ago.
If Sark was here you would be burning him at the stake. Petersen has f-ed up calls late in games twice.....inexcusable for the salary he is making.
I remember when this board had standards for coaches.....it was only 9 months ago.
If Sark was here you would be burning him at the stake. Petersen has f-ed up calls late in games twice.....inexcusable for the salary he is making.
Why do people bring up the "at that salary" argument?
1) You, nor any of us have to pay that salary. Not a fucking penny.
2) Any coach at UW will get that salary or close to it. It's what the job pays.
3) You imply if he were making less the decisions would be OK.
4) It's a stupid arbitrary measure. It might be a lot of money to some, not so to others. (he's only at #20 in the nation)
5) LIPO
6) see my post from 9/28http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/13149/im-i-the-only-negadawg-left/p1
7) ?
8) profit
I went over yo dawgman this morning and was pleasantly surprised that Kim is getting quite a bit of pushbsck for his campaign to get people riled up against Petersen. There are actually quite a few people saying things like "this was supposed to be a higher level discussion board and now we have the people who made it that way egging on and backing up the complainers"
I remember when this board had standards for coaches.....it was only 9 months ago.
If Sark was here you would be burning him at the stake. Petersen has f-ed up calls late in games twice.....inexcusable for the salary he is making.
Why do people bring up the "at that salary" argument?
1) You, nor any of us have to pay that salary. Not a fucking penny.
2) Any coach at UW will get that salary or close to it. It's what the job pays.
3) You imply if he were making less the decisions would be OK.
4) It's a stupid arbitrary measure. It might be a lot of money to some, not so to others. (he's only at #20 in the nation)
5) LIPO
6) see my post from 9/28http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/13149/im-i-the-only-negadawg-left/p1
7) ?
8) profit
Dick Baird made the same points on Saturday night about the money Pete is earning.
Looking on doogman there is almost this exact same thread about complainers. Complaining about complainers is always pretty awesome.
HuskyClaus says all the complaining is sickening. There are days he can't come to the board because it's so depressing. This place is becoming doogman jr because you guys are all Petersen guys. HuskyClaus and WunderDoog would fit right in here.
I'm a fucking Petersen guy myself and loved the hire. I was very vocal about that, but fuck, you go 2-5 and make some questionable coaching decisions and fans are going to be pissed off and question things. If it was Nuss or Wilcox or some other shitty coach that was 2-5, you guys who still cared would be going off the rails over this season. It's not really about Petersen, it's about the results.
What the fuck are the boards for? No criticism or comments until it's played out for three years? If you think it's a dead horse, make a topic about players or individual plays if you want to talk about other stuff. Were the million threads last year about Sark being a fucking joke not beating a dead horse?
Looking on doogman there is almost this exact same thread about complainers. Complaining about complainers is always pretty awesome.
HuskyClaus says all the complaining is sickening. There are days he can't come to the board because it's so depressing. This place is becoming doogman jr because you guys are all Petersen guys. HuskyClaus and WunderDoog would fit right in here.
I'm a fucking Petersen guy myself and loved the hire. I was very vocal about that, but fuck, you go 2-5 and make some questionable coaching decisions and fans are going to be pissed off and question things. If it was Nuss or Wilcox or some other shitty coach that was 2-5, you guys who still cared would be going off the rails over this season. It's not really about Petersen, it's about the results.
What the fuck are the boards for? No criticism or comments until it's played out for three years? If you think it's a dead horse, make a topic about players or individual plays if you want to talk about other stuff. Were the million threads last year about Sark being a fucking joke not beating a dead horse?
Complaining about complainers complaining about complainers.... Well done.
I remember when this board had standards for coaches.....it was only 9 months ago.
If Sark was here you would be burning him at the stake. Petersen has f-ed up calls late in games twice.....inexcusable for the salary he is making.
Thought you ran your car off the I5 bridge?
I don't drive a car