Ginsberg Sells the Couch

[Goduckies]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

 

[Bob_C]

Get Joe to tip his hand on a replacement, he’s bound to piss off a wing of his crazy party.

 

[pawz]

Classy.
http://mobile.twitter.com/YahooNews/status/1307127173644537857

 

[NorthwestFresh]

Not classy from CNN.
https://twitter.com/rezaaslan/status/1307107507131875330?s=21

 

[LoneStarDawg]

Not classy from CNN.
https://twitter.com/rezaaslan/status/1307107507131875330?s=21

We?

 

[89ute]

What I'm hearing
https://twitter.com/johnfund/status/1307109321721995265?s=09

 

[GreenRiverGatorz]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

Really? The dems trying to steal an election in Florida in 2000? Stealing an election in 1960 in Illinois? Using the CIA, FBI, DOJ and the US House of Representatives to unseat a President? Are you 6 months old?

 

[Emoterman]

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

Really? The dems trying to steal an election in Florida in 2000? Stealing an election in 1960 in Illinois? Using the CIA, FBI, DOJ and the US House of Representatives to unseat a President? Are you 6 months old?

2000 was litigated, the process worked.

No idea what this Illinois thing is.

Wash your hands old timmer.

 

[LoneStarDawg]

View attachment 32892

View attachment 18028

 

[Tequilla]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisy

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisy

I don’t have so much faith in these fuckers to accuse of hypocrisy. It’s pure, power created political rules. Not legal. They are shameless people.

 

[Emoterman]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisy

https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1307148623721922560?s=20

 

[Dude61]

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisy

https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1307148623721922560?s=20

It’s power, simple as that.

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

On a certain moral level, Pelosi’s visit to a hair doo was worse because that was proscribed from everyone else.

 

[NorthwestFresh]

Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably

I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.

Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.

Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisy

Not really. The other times were with a lake duck President, and not one up for a second term. Why are you lying? This would be a weighed political move for Trump to have a new SCOTUS member. Obama wasn’t going to have a third-term.

 

[NorthwestFresh]

The idiots not understanding the politics of this vacancy with a president up for re-election versus an outgoing president should not vote. Do you morons understand elections?