"Gay conversations" science paper was fabricated; retracted from Science journal

DerekJohnson

DerekJohnson

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:

naturalnews.com/049809_gay_science_retraction_propaganda_agenda.html
 
You need to send this to the UW "Q" Center. They have a section for publishing emails called "Dear Queer".

cropped-lo1.jpg

"Queering a World Class Education"

They are very inclusive, except for hating former military, conservative, religious, white, male, heterosexuals. (You of course know Coach James fit all those categories.)

They also sponsor the "Lavender" Graduation Ceremony.

link: UW Q Center.edu
 
Last edited:
A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:
Click to expand...

Hi There. Actually, the Journal Science is what's known as a peer review journal, meaning that it encourages peers to review the scientific submission of others. When peers attempted to build on the study described in the article, some issues with the original data surfaced, which led to one of the co authors to seek a retraction of the article, until those data issues can be addressed. In other words, the peer review nature of the journal, worked as intended. The scientific community wasn't tricked, as you suggest. Perhaps your favorite media outlet was tricked, can't really say.

Please let us know, when any of the scientists you support, in the fields of creation science, or anti global warming science, as examples, submit their studies to peer review journals. Thank you.

 
A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:
Click to expand...

Hi There. Actually, the Journal Science is what's known as a peer review journal, meaning that it encourages peers to review the scientific submission of others. When peers attempted to build on the study described in the article, some issues with the original data surfaced, which led to one of the co authors to seek a retraction of the article, until those data issues can be addressed. In other words, the peer review nature of the journal, worked as intended. The scientific community wasn't tricked, as you suggest. Perhaps your favorite media outlet was tricked, can't really say.

Please let us know, when any of the scientists you support, in the fields of creation science, or anti global warming science, as examples, submit their studies to peer review journals. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Fucking fascinating. How's your supply of "The" OSU Anal Lube holding out? It now comes in flavors.

AnalEzeStrawberry2PackSmall.jpg
 
A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:
Click to expand...

Hi There. Actually, the Journal Science is what's known as a peer review journal, meaning that it encourages peers to review the scientific submission of others. When peers attempted to build on the study described in the article, some issues with the original data surfaced, which led to one of the co authors to seek a retraction of the article, until those data issues can be addressed. In other words, the peer review nature of the journal, worked as intended. The scientific community wasn't tricked, as you suggest. Perhaps your favorite media outlet was tricked, can't really say.

Please let us know, when any of the scientists you support, in the fields of creation science, or anti global warming science, as examples, submit their studies to peer review journals. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a few people around here need a refresher on the scientific method.

CHRIST.
 
Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.
Click to expand...

Like I said, so many faggots in here. Happy Harvey Milk Day, PJ.
Click to expand...

It's interesting that some bigots conclude that only gay people, support gay rights. And these bigots like to use hate speech to support their bigot cause.

I've said it before d2d. You really should seek out professional mental help. As a pretend attorney, I'm guessing you can afford it? If not, maybe you can find a therapist that accepts pretend money.
 
Last edited:
Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.
Click to expand...

Like I said, so many faggots in here. Happy Harvey Milk Day, PJ.
Click to expand...

It's interesting that some bigots conclude that only gay people, support gay rights. And these bigots like to use hate speech to support their bigot cause.

I've said it before d2d. You really should seek out professional mental help. As a pretend attorney, I'm guessing you can afford it? If not, maybe you can find one that accepts pretend money.
Click to expand...

You sound like you're experienced. I'm sure you were helped immensely by the Scarlet & Gay Society.

website_header_2_1039876585.jpg


62456484.jpg
Click to expand...

link: The Ohio State University Scarlet and Gay Alumni Society
 
Last edited:
Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.
Click to expand...

Like I said, so many faggots in here. Happy Harvey Milk Day, PJ.
Click to expand...

It's interesting that some bigots conclude that only gay people, support gay rights. And these bigots like to use hate speech to support their bigot cause.

I've said it before d2d. You really should seek out professional mental help. As a pretend attorney, I'm guessing you can afford it? If not, maybe you can find one that accepts pretend money.
Click to expand...

You sound like you're experienced. I'm sure you were helped immensely by the Scarlet & Gay Society.

website_header_2_1039876585.jpg


62456484.jpg
Click to expand...

link: The Ohio State University Scarlet and Gay Alumni Society
Click to expand...

It's time to step away from the keyboard, buddy.

I'm starting to feel sorry for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top