Despite the fact that the course looks horrible and there have been a ton of really shitty outcomes from great shots, with 12 holes to go, the leaderboard is outstanding. Better than any major that I can recall in a long time. Maybe the USGA is getting lucky like Sark did against Stanford and Arizona last year.
Despite the fact that the course looks horrible and there have been a ton of really shitty outcomes from great shots, with 12 holes to go, the leaderboard is outstanding. Better than any major that I can recall in a long time. Maybe the USGA is getting lucky like Sark did against Stanford and Arizona last year.
I love youThese cocksuckers who say, "Get in the hole!" yell, tell players they love them (wtf) and whoo after every single shot need to DIAFF.
The course fucking sucks. On KJR all week they were trying to convince people at that all these pro golfers are wrong and it's a fantastic course.
The course fucking sucks. On KJR all week they were trying to convince people at that all these pro golfers are wrong and it's a fantastic course.
If you're listening to KJR you know you suck.
I love youThese cocksuckers who say, "Get in the hole!" yell, tell players they love them (wtf) and whoo after every single shot need to DIAFF.
The course is shit and you're all fags
Winners win and losers three putt the 18th. Fuck off.
The course is shit and you're all fags
Doesn't every single British Open course have ugly, brown, uneven grass/greens too? Nobody ever complains. Plus the weather is always awful. At least it's nice in Tacoma.
Doesn't every single British Open course have ugly, brown, uneven grass/greens too? Nobody ever complains. Plus the weather is always awful. At least it's nice in Tacoma.
Move to Cockingham, you Limey fuck.
The winner said 18 sucked ... as a Par 4. Was also quoted as saying it is a great par 5.
I was shocked that the USGA played 18 as a par 5 today ... was an absolutely great call.
The scores were great today and solid for the tournament overall. 274 is a solid score for winning.
The browness of the course is standard for almost all of the US Open courses - it's called firm and fast.
Two things for anybody bitching about the greens:
1) most putts I saw missed were tied to hesitant and poor strokes - these greens demanded firm and confident strokes vs babying putts into the hole
2) you could argue that the course setup was also influenced by the greens to make for more opportunities for players to score
And finally, the #2 player in the world won. When the US Amateur was played in 2010, the final consisted on the #1 and #2 amateurs in the world. If the measure of a championship course is identifying the best player(s), hard to argue with the results that Chambers is producing