MikeSeaver
New Fish
Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
UW: 10
UO: 16
Last edited by a moderator:
The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
Here we go. Thought you had lost the touch, Mike.
But the replies are now pouring in.
The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
So you don’t judge programs by wins?
Interesting take.
The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
So you don’t judge programs by wins?
Interesting take.
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?
The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
So you don’t judge programs by wins?
Interesting take.
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?
The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
So you don’t judge programs by wins?
Interesting take.
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?
Yale Football > Alabama Football
The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
So you don’t judge programs by wins?
Interesting take.
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?
Yale Football > Alabama Football
But we don’t even hear about Yale anymore. That was a really long time ago when they were good.
I bet a lot of those fans have died.
Another fun stat: Oregon is a shitty party school designed to be Wazzu/Beavlet with money but has only come close to achieving their goal once when they lost to Cam Newton's NFL tryout debut.
I don't see what this has to do with a Tier 2 school with a couple of natties under their belt.
Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
How many in last 3 years?
How many in last 3 years?
You sound like a Beaver fan in 2008.
You can start a last 3 years thread if you’d like I mean besides every other thread on every other board.
Edit: the “last 3 years” are included in the original post. Otherwise it would have been Oregon 15 UW 7.
Oh man.
Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.