Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich denied bail

If those rules in Georgia were so awful, why did Democrats win both the senate races? Why did Stacey Abrams avoid Biden when he came to Georgia to further distort the claims about the laws?

You can’t be serious. The statute was amended. It says exactly what I said it says.

But Stacey Abrams!
 
I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.
 
I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.

I simply answered a question.

 
I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.

I simply answered a question.

You never answer questions.
 
If those rules in Georgia were so awful, why did Democrats win both the senate races? Why did Stacey Abrams avoid Biden when he came to Georgia to further distort the claims about the laws?

You can’t be serious. The statute was amended. It says exactly what I said it says.

But Stacey Abrams!

Selective edit
 
If those rules in Georgia were so awful, why did Democrats win both the senate races? Why did Stacey Abrams avoid Biden when he came to Georgia to further distort the claims about the laws?

You can’t be serious. The statute was amended. It says exactly what I said it says.

But Stacey Abrams!
Stacey Abrams did have lots to say about Georgia voting laws, so she's quite relevant. Did you think that was dunking on me?

It says what it says...which is what? Are these Jim Crow 2.0 laws, as you say? And I am serious, if these laws are as nefarious as you say, it would seem that no black people were able to vote, and republicans won.

Or...what are you saying exactly?
Here is what I am saying: Democrats and their media buddies severely distorted the laws and made them sound so evil that it's laughable. You *seem* to be parroting that nonsense. Maybe you are not. I am saying that blue states have similar laws. All states have some laws about voting that could be deemed as *restrictive* if CNN wants to write about it. I also note that not all politicians in Georgia are white, and that the laws had to pass through at least some non white scrutiny. So there's that. And I don't live there, so maybe I'm missing something. And is it just about 'passing out water'? Yes, the heat is sweltering in November and people have to stand in line for 8 hours. C'mon man.

What is that you are saying?
 
Last edited:
Poll workers are free to set up a place where anyone can get a drink of water. Most of these polling places are located in churches or schools or some other public building, all of them have water fountains and there is nothing stopping anyone from getting a drink of water. Of course you could always just bring a bottle of water with you when you vote but we're talking about Rat party voters here and we know they want to have someone wipe their asses for them. What you can't do is handout "drink" which has now conveniently been morphed into "water" when in reality it was usually booze while you're soliciting votes.

The same people who lie to you and claim that requiring voter ID is like "Jim Crow" are the same people now who are lying and claiming you can't get a drink of water while you're standing in line to vote.
 
I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.

I simply answered a question.
Public bail hearing is fascist too? You gals do get hysterical.

--What question were you answering?
 
I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.

Of course it moved into Georgia voting laws. No way in hell Dazzler was going to defend his bullshit about people being asked to leave therefore beating them was okay garbage.
 
Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that

rnxpbg2jyas3.png

In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people
 
If anything, the law in Georgia is specific to not allow for weasel words. "Well, you didn't say we couldn't pass out water! So we're passing out water and wearing these shirts that just have our candidate's name on it"
You'd think lawyers would be able to pick up on things like that.
 
Democrats will democrat. BTW Tammany Hall were democrats. CRT doesn't really teach that

View attachment 48105

In Tammany New York, votes were acquired through social contact and practical favors, financial and legal assistance, jobs and drinks at the pub. The direct financial beneficiaries were, yes, the politicians and the businessmen who got contracts at far above the market price—-but also the poor families whose rent got paid, the boy who got a job working for the new El being put up along Greenwich Street and 9th Avenue, the couple whose hotel room was paid for when they were burnt out of their apartment. In less cynical terms: Tammany was a corruption, but it was a corruption of something good: the idea that government should, as Plunkitt said, be “warm and personal;” that decisions should be made locally; that rulers should directly and practically help the ruled; that there should be an everyday and immediate connection between the politicians and the people
https://internauta-online.com/2014/06/theodore-roosevelt-how-we-overthrew-corrupt-tammany-hall/

History repeating itself. Police doing the government's bidding, corrupt politicians, newspapers running cover.

No wonder the Dems yanked down TR's statue.

 
Last edited:
If those rules in Georgia were so awful, why did Democrats win both the senate races? Why did Stacey Abrams avoid Biden when he came to Georgia to further distort the claims about the laws?

You can’t be serious. The statute was amended. It says exactly what I said it says.

But Stacey Abrams!
Stacey Abrams did have lots to say about Georgia voting laws, so she's quite relevant. Did you think that was dunking on me?

It says what it says...which is what? Are these Jim Crow 2.0 laws, as you say? And I am serious, if these laws are as nefarious as you say, it would seem that no black people were able to vote, and republicans won.

Or...what are you saying exactly?
Here is what I am saying: Democrats and their media buddies severely distorted the laws and made them sound so evil that it's laughable. You *seem* to be parroting that nonsense. Maybe you are not. I am saying that blue states have similar laws. All states have some laws about voting that could be deemed as *restrictive* if CNN wants to write about it. I also note that not all politicians in Georgia are white, and that the laws had to pass through at least some non white scrutiny. So there's that. And I don't live there, so maybe I'm missing something. And is it just about 'passing out water'? Yes, the heat is sweltering in November and people have to stand in line for 8 hours. C'mon man.

What is that you are saying?

Delaware has stricter voting laws than Georgia. Must be like Jim Crow 2.0 on steroids.
 
If those rules in Georgia were so awful, why did Democrats win both the senate races? Why did Stacey Abrams avoid Biden when he came to Georgia to further distort the claims about the laws?

You can’t be serious. The statute was amended. It says exactly what I said it says.

But Stacey Abrams!
Stacey Abrams did have lots to say about Georgia voting laws, so she's quite relevant. Did you think that was dunking on me?

It says what it says...which is what? Are these Jim Crow 2.0 laws, as you say? And I am serious, if these laws are as nefarious as you say, it would seem that no black people were able to vote, and republicans won.

Or...what are you saying exactly?
Here is what I am saying: Democrats and their media buddies severely distorted the laws and made them sound so evil that it's laughable. You *seem* to be parroting that nonsense. Maybe you are not. I am saying that blue states have similar laws. All states have some laws about voting that could be deemed as *restrictive* if CNN wants to write about it. I also note that not all politicians in Georgia are white, and that the laws had to pass through at least some non white scrutiny. So there's that. And I don't live there, so maybe I'm missing something. And is it just about 'passing out water'? Yes, the heat is sweltering in November and people have to stand in line for 8 hours. C'mon man.

What is that you are saying?

Delaware has stricter voting laws than Georgia. Must be like Jim Crow 2.0 on steroids.

I simply tried to engage.
 
I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.

I simply answered a question.

No, you don't answer questions. That's because you're a shitty human being. You'd cut off a limb rather than answer a simple Y/N question. Clown.
 
I like how this started with someone laughing at a peaceful protestor being denied bail, and now it's shifted to a CNN narrative of voter laws in Georgia being somehow racist. Not overly, but if you really look hard, you can at least see the systemic racism and bias in there.

I simply answered a question.

No, you don't answer questions. That's because you're a shitty human being. You'd cut off a limb rather than answer a simple Y/N question. Clown.

Can you imagine being a client of our hypothetical lawyer and asking him for his opinion on your legal case and then expecting an honest and accurate answer?
 
Back
Top