So what's the point in all this? Do you honestly want Strausser fired?
Foster Sarell, we got a shot with him?
- Thread starter PurpleReign
- Start date
So what's the point in all this? Do you honestly want Strausser fired?
CokeGreaterThanPepsi
New Fish
It's not just one guy is the thing though.
FremontTroll
New Fish
You've just re-taken the lead from Kim on the race for who can make the last ever 0-12 argument.
Lets see if it holds.
Dennis_DeYoung
New Fish
I like AVT more than Fozzy. So, I guess I don't get your point.
I'm invested in us getting 3 OL around the same level of talent as the rest of our recruits (like, say WR, or DB!).
At this point, unless a miracle happens that's not going to come to pass. That sucks.
CuntWaffle
New Fish
/thread
@Dennis_DeYoung And @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, the fact that you guys actually make the argument that players matter is what is retarded. No fucking shit players matter. Is water wet too?
You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.
Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.
I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.
If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs.
You want a coach that can recruit and coach? What a fucking novel concept. I want a QB like DeShaun Watson and a RB like Fournette, but I'm not going to complain about Browning and Gaskin.
Everyone here wants Sarrell. The retarded part of this is getting mad that we "might" not have a great OL three years from now when we have all the pieces needed to get to the playoffs THIS fucking year. We have the OL to win the conference THIS fucking year. But continue to spaz out over the OL coach because some teenager might not come to UW.
I hated Petersen until this year, but I can't bitch about an undefeated coach. I can't bitch about the OL coach of the best OL of the conference because he might not get Sarrell.
If we win big the next two years, recruiting will take care of itself. Winning helps. He's not committing for a long time anyways and we have an undefeated team. The future has always been for doogs.
WilburHooksHands
New Fish
lmfao @ "Straußer"
In the past, I haven't always agreed with you, @RoadDawg55 but this deserves post of the year
CokeGreaterThanPepsi
New Fish
We are just at different parts of the universe here. I am enjoying the fuck out of this season, a big reason is because I could see it coming because of how Pete was recruiting.
I want to be great this year, and great in two years and in five years. If we don't recruit better on the OL it will hurt us going forward. So yeah, i'd like us to recruit better at OL.
doogsinparadise
New Fish
You kinda get it, and kinda don't. Wanting to be good in two years AS WELL as this year is like two sides of the same fucking coin. Just because they patched bullshit and chicken wire together into a usable line this year has no bearing on whether they'd be able to do the same next year.
I know you are enjoying this year. And I still love you. There are a lot of variables other than Fozzy though. We don't know if Roberts, the big kid from Oregon, Burleson, etc suck. Maybe they just aren't ready right now.
My early opinion is that the next two years are our best chance at a title. Not on some orange slices shit, but the coaching staff has made a big effort to get Sarrell and if he doesn't come, it will be hard for me to do anything but shrug.
If the OL sucks in a few years I will certainly bitch, but until they do, why would I complain about anything. This is completely different than Sark whiffing on Garnett.
Dennis_DeYoung
New Fish
1) Okay then. STFU.
2) I'm sorry we are upsetting your happy timez with our negativity.
----
Not since the days of dawgman have I seen anyone more on their period about how THE SKY IS NOT FALLING, OL RECRUITING WILL BE FINE and ENJOY THE RIDE GUYS than @RoadDawg55 is. His bleeding vag needs a fucking 12 day trigger warning every time someone brings up OL recruiting. You can always count on him to come in and slop cunt blood all over whatever thread it is where people are talking about how our OL recruiting sucks.
It's just fundamentally retarded to argue we can't think about the future and this year at the same time. But I guess if you're the leader of the OL Board Period Police it's important that this be a safe space for you and your friends where you can just only think about this year.
Last edited:
WilburHooksHands
New Fish
Lots of perversions and divisions of the fanbase going on in this thread imo.
You're being a pussy and have a serious TBS addiction. When the OL sucks we can bitch. Until then, stfu. It really is fucking retarded to complain about the coach of the best OL we have had in well over a decade. I don't know why you have such a hard time with that line of thinking. It's seems obviously logical to me.
Gladstone
New Fish
it isn't logical lol
neither is the notion that enjoying this season and worrying about OL recruiting are mutually exclusive
i want to be this good again in the near future
to do so we need to recruit at a high level. OL recruiting has left a lot to be desired this year
is this just a weird troll or what. did a bunch of recruitniks beat you up and steal your jacket? why even read this particular forum if it irks you so? no only do you apparently ngaf, but you feel it necessary to sanctimoniously preach at others here under some vague 'all will be well if we win' mantra.
and lol @ saying dennis has a tbs addiction. the fuck?
still love you though, bae
neither is the notion that enjoying this season and worrying about OL recruiting are mutually exclusive
i want to be this good again in the near future
to do so we need to recruit at a high level. OL recruiting has left a lot to be desired this year
is this just a weird troll or what. did a bunch of recruitniks beat you up and steal your jacket? why even read this particular forum if it irks you so? no only do you apparently ngaf, but you feel it necessary to sanctimoniously preach at others here under some vague 'all will be well if we win' mantra.
and lol @ saying dennis has a tbs addiction. the fuck?
still love you though, bae
Dennis_DeYoung
New Fish
hurtful.
The last post I'll make about this for awhile because we obviously aren't going to agree.
The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.
Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.
So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have.
@Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now.
The difference between the dogman "sky is not falling bullshit" is that we aren't .500 like we always were back then. We are undefeated and favored to win the rest of our games.
Our OL has gotten markedly better from last year, which normally means the coach is developing players. That didn't happen under Sark/Cozzetto. It has happened under Strausser and Pete. Coaches that develop their unit into the best in the conference deserve the benefit of the doubt. Simple fact.
So the sky isn't really falling, whether we get Sarrell or not. Any 5 star from the state is needed, but we might still have a good OL without Sarrell. That was never going to happen by not getting Garnett and the other guys Sark missed. If you can't see those differences, I can't help you. Things fucking change, and it's okay to admit it when they have.
@Gladstone, I followed TBS for years as a teenager and in my early 20's, but it's creepy to follow as a 30, 40 year old man. All is well for Husky Football right now.
Last edited:
whatshouldicareabout
Active poster
This thread helped me remember that I hate everyone on this board