FremontTroll
New Fish
Yes exactly.
Foster Sarell to UW: Yes or No?
- Thread starter BabsGilbyTawdTy
- Start date
Yes exactly.
NeGgaPlEaSe
New Fish
Also strange we had a QB who actually tossed the rock around
DawgFader
New Fish
The recruiting lately is good (Top 30ish). It's now moving towards great (Top 15), and probably gonna be even better moving forward.
It's the collective group and balance of the class as a whole Petersen's after. Salvon Ahmed could end up being Corey Dillon good (Pumped about this guy) while another kid like a Brandon Beavers that Sark and Heyward were nutting over doesn't hit the second floor, let alone his ceiling.
Why we would get Foster...As for our Oline, it was good enough to win the PAC12 this year. Foster would really help our lines competitiveness take that next step.
Why we would miss on him...No excuse, missing on a Foster quality kid (once every 5 years type: Bannon Garrnett, Decastro etc...), is just as unacceptable today as it was then.
All WA STATE kids we offer should be no brainer's and how it's not is perplexing? It's called pride. If Foster doesn't go to the UW he never bought in and thats sad. Most kids that play football west of the Mountains grew up dreaming of playing for UW (* except for the last 10 years). Getting the kids dreaming again is Petersen's job and I'm betting his philosophy is going to pay off huge.
Side note...this class is trying to add to Henry Bainivalu, who is really good. A Foster, Jackson, Davis quality kid would put this Oline Class right where UW needs it to be, year in and year out. The games are dictated in the trenches and UW can't afford to miss on a Foster EVER.
The program should expect 4* or better across the board with sprinkles of Ty Jones 3*'s from here on out.
It's the collective group and balance of the class as a whole Petersen's after. Salvon Ahmed could end up being Corey Dillon good (Pumped about this guy) while another kid like a Brandon Beavers that Sark and Heyward were nutting over doesn't hit the second floor, let alone his ceiling.
Why we would get Foster...As for our Oline, it was good enough to win the PAC12 this year. Foster would really help our lines competitiveness take that next step.
Why we would miss on him...No excuse, missing on a Foster quality kid (once every 5 years type: Bannon Garrnett, Decastro etc...), is just as unacceptable today as it was then.
All WA STATE kids we offer should be no brainer's and how it's not is perplexing? It's called pride. If Foster doesn't go to the UW he never bought in and thats sad. Most kids that play football west of the Mountains grew up dreaming of playing for UW (* except for the last 10 years). Getting the kids dreaming again is Petersen's job and I'm betting his philosophy is going to pay off huge.
Side note...this class is trying to add to Henry Bainivalu, who is really good. A Foster, Jackson, Davis quality kid would put this Oline Class right where UW needs it to be, year in and year out. The games are dictated in the trenches and UW can't afford to miss on a Foster EVER.
The program should expect 4* or better across the board with sprinkles of Ty Jones 3*'s from here on out.
Last edited:
That's kind of like the its snowing out so there is no global warming argument
I agree that we could use a change in the climate (lol) of our O line recruiting. But my long history of recruiting has told me coaches recruit areas and the head man is the closer. We have an O line coach that develops the good and the bad that we recruit.
As you know because we had a similar argument about Troy Black Power versus Miles, I don't think any coach is infallible. Maybe Petersen should fire the O line coach. Or maybe he should step in and make sure we get better O line recruits.
We all agree we want a road grading boss hog O line. We've been crying for one for 20 years. This is as close as we have got.
By the way, fuck Fozzy.
CuntWaffle
New Fish
Climate change*
FremontTroll
New Fish
I don't follow.
Jones, Bynum, and Cook committed long before the season started.
GaryFromTeenMom
New Fish
Well fuck....Stanford dickheads are way out there.
http://thecardboard.org/board/index.php?topic=14561.105
"Not just any writer. Ruth Robbins, who is sort of a legendary Huskies message board publisher and recruiting news reporter. If she can be a homer, she will. So if RR is saying Sarell to Stanford, it's pretty much a lock."
lol.
http://thecardboard.org/board/index.php?topic=14561.105
"Not just any writer. Ruth Robbins, who is sort of a legendary Huskies message board publisher and recruiting news reporter. If she can be a homer, she will. So if RR is saying Sarell to Stanford, it's pretty much a lock."
lol.
Last edited:
This isn't the tug so I'll just say my arguments often contain more nuance than they are given credit for