Former head of pac-12 refs comments on Kevin Smith's catch.

Passion

Passion

New Fish
"Don't agree with the rev in Stan-UW, not indisputable."

No shit fuckhead. Who the fuck trained the current crop of idiots?
 
Last edited:
Agree. And what about that BS call on the clean hit during the kickoff return (or whatever return type it was)
 
Agree. And what about that BS call on the clean hit during the kickoff return (or whatever return type it was)
Click to expand...

Both of those calls were such homer calls. What bullshit. UW should lodge formal complaints to the conference, of course larry scott only cares about california schools so it'll be pointless.
 
The catch call was clear to me. But that kickoff return block call was the most pussified shit I had seen in a long time. But not to be outdone, Sark reclaims his perch with a nice end game cry.
 
The catch call was clear to me. But that kickoff return block call was the most pussified shit I had seen in a long time. But not to be outdone, Sark reclaims his perch with a nice end game cry.
Click to expand...

All of this is true.

The Pac-12 office confirmed the reversal today, because the ball hit the fucking ground.

 
The catch call the rule on reviews is it has to be conclusive.

Had they called it incomplete you guys would be correct. However, the call on the field was a completion. It wasn't conclusive evidence to over turn it.

Now did that cost UW the game? No it didn't. Would UW had won had they made that coach? Who really knows? It's not like the Huskies have Folk as their kicker so you still had a good 25 yards to go if not more to feel comfortable with the kick.

It is okay to say the call was wrong to overturn it AND point out that UW fucked themselves way before that call so it shouldn't have came down to that.
 
Last edited:
The catch call the rule on reviews is it has to be conclusive.

Had they called it incomplete you guys would be correct. However, the call on the field was a completion. It wasn't conclusive evidence to over turn it.

Now did that cost UW the game? No it didn't. Would UW had won had they made that coach? Who really knows? It's not like the Huskies have Folk as their kicker so you still had a good 25 yards to go if not more to feel comfortable with the kick.

It is okay to say the call was wrong to overturn it AND point out that UW fucked themselves way before that call so it shouldn't have came down to that.
Click to expand...

For the 781st time, there is conclusive evidence of the football on the ground. That's conclusive evidence to overturn in this case.

 
More importantly if we complain about it online for another week or two they will overturn the game result, 2005seahawksFS
 
Reduce, reuse, recycle:

BV36CAVCYAAJeSM.jpg:large
 
Reduce, reuse, recycle:

BV36CAVCYAAJeSM.jpg:large
Click to expand...

Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.
 
Last edited:
Reduce, reuse, recycle:

BV36CAVCYAAJeSM.jpg:large
Click to expand...

Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.
Click to expand...

926.gif
 
If that picture shows nothing it is high time I pour gasoline over my head and light a match. It is amazing what people choose to see and not see. Part of the human condition.

The game didn't come to that play plenty of other factors.
 
A lot of people, who are impartial, said there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call.

Fuck ASJ for not catching it on 3rd down. Never should have gotten to 4th down.
 
Reduce, reuse, recycle:

BV36CAVCYAAJeSM.jpg:large
Click to expand...

Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.
Click to expand...

Passion's dooging it up for reals today.
 
Passion, frankly not your best effort. You have brought a much higher level of discussion then this. We all have our days!
 
A lot of people, who are impartial, said there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Why would an impartial observor - who also had access to the video and still shots - say that the evidence was inconclusive?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top