BennyBeaver
New Fish
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...imple_clear_conservative_messages.single.html
and with that i'm hungry so it's lunch time.
and with that i'm hungry so it's lunch time.
food for thought...
- Thread starter BennyBeaver
- Start date
Slate is your source??!!
CuntWaffle
New Fish
The chick that wrote this is probably one of those "ban or cap corporate profits" cunts who goes to Starbucks daily and buys every new model of iPhone when they come out.
CuntWaffle
New Fish
"Are mopeds dangerous? Sure, if by dangerous you mean significantly riskier than cars but slightly less direful than motorcycles. They are not dangerous compared to smoking a lot of cigarettes or owning a gun. The point is that, while nothing about the bumper sticker backed up its ominous claim, I automatically accepted it."
Stopped reading after that.
Stopped reading after that.
Last edited:
The chick that wrote this is probably one of those "ban or cap corporate profits" cunts who goes to Starbucks daily and buys every new model of iPhone when they come out.
Its an old story. Conservatives are simple minded, stupid, shallow while liberals are deep thinking intellectuals
Rinse lather repeat
No proof just some simpleton from Comedy Central. Which is where most deep thinking libs get their news
BennyBeaver
New Fish
The chick that wrote this is probably one of those "ban or cap corporate profits" cunts who goes to Starbucks daily and buys every new model of iPhone when they come out.
Its an old story. Conservatives are simple minded, stupid, shallow while liberals are deep thinking intellectuals
Rinse lather repeat
No proof just some simpleton from Comedy Central. Which is where most deep thinking libs get their news
It seems your reading comprehension still sucks.
BennyBeaver
New Fish
It's tough when the article takes longer to read than you can actually focus on something.
Do you have ADD?
BennyBeaver
New Fish
The chick that wrote this is probably one of those "ban or cap corporate profits" cunts who goes to Starbucks daily and buys every new model of iPhone when they come out.
Last edited:
CuntWaffle
New Fish
If you can't see how hypocritical that paragraph is then I can't help you.
BennyBeaver
New Fish
I don't really need your help, thanks. But this might help you out, the bumper-sticker analogy is threaded throughout the article as an illustration of the main point. In other words, her opinion about mopeds, cars, guns, or cigarettes (was it the mention of "dangerous guns" that threw you into a tailspin?) doesn't make a bit of difference.
The chick that wrote this is probably one of those "ban or cap corporate profits" cunts who goes to Starbucks daily and buys every new model of iPhone when they come out.
Its an old story. Conservatives are simple minded, stupid, shallow while liberals are deep thinking intellectuals
Rinse lather repeat
No proof just some simpleton from Comedy Central. Which is where most deep thinking libs get their news
It seems your reading comprehension still sucks.
You sound defensive
the article you linked was a bumper sticker
HTH
CuntWaffle
New Fish
/thread
BennyBeaver
New Fish
Looks like someone else didn't read the whole article or any of the other sources.
Yeah, I guess I just dismiss Colbert outright because he is, after all, a fucking comedian.
The rest of those clowns just champion shit like social semiotics because it keeps them employed. They have no real basis other than "studies" where you're supposed to assume they went into it with no bias or thesis in mind.
hth, and fuck off.
BennyBeaver
New Fish
The chick that wrote this is probably one of those "ban or cap corporate profits" cunts who goes to Starbucks daily and buys every new model of iPhone when they come out.
Its an old story. Conservatives are simple minded, stupid, shallow while liberals are deep thinking intellectuals
Rinse lather repeat
No proof just some simpleton from Comedy Central. Which is where most deep thinking libs get their news
It seems your reading comprehension still sucks.
You sound defensive
Not defensive. Sorry for the blunt, negative reply.
You either didn't read the article and the sources OR you are unable to understand OR you're lazy OR you don't give a fuck.
But since you responded, it seems you give a fuck. So why can't you come up with something else in response than dismissive, name-calling? Laziness? Lack of understanding?
There's tons of proof cited.
Rinse lather repeat that, mister.
"proof"
Have you ever worked for any of these shitbags? Have you ever helped them collect their "data" or formulate their bullshit "theories"? Let me educate you as someone who has...
They want more research funding, and will feed libs whatever slop gets them that.
Have you ever worked for any of these shitbags? Have you ever helped them collect their "data" or formulate their bullshit "theories"? Let me educate you as someone who has...
They want more research funding, and will feed libs whatever slop gets them that.
The chick that wrote this is probably one of those "ban or cap corporate profits" cunts who goes to Starbucks daily and buys every new model of iPhone when they come out.
Its an old story. Conservatives are simple minded, stupid, shallow while liberals are deep thinking intellectuals
Rinse lather repeat
No proof just some simpleton from Comedy Central. Which is where most deep thinking libs get their news
It seems your reading comprehension still sucks.
You sound defensive
Not defensive. Sorry for the blunt, negative reply.
You either didn't read the article and the sources OR you are unable to understand OR you're lazy OR you don't give a fuck.
But since you responded, it seems you give a fuck. So why can't you come up with something else in response than dismissive, name-calling? Laziness? Lack of understanding?
There's tons of proof cited.
Rinse lather repeat that, mister.
Obviously we aren't smart enough to understand these complex issues that oddly enough seemed to be presented with dismissive name calling.
Why don't you dumb it down for us in your own words?