Florida passes 6 week abortion plan

[RaceBannon]

Demonrats approve of post birth abortions! So Dazzler how about those murder charges for unborn children of murdered mothers? Explain that to me if you can do late term or post term abortions. Type slow we don't want you to injure yourself too badly.

Sleddy, you need to get these equivocating pseudo pro-lifers out on the carpet and make them clarify how they distinguish themselves from the 9 mos. abortionists. As it is, I see no difference, other than political expediency.

PS: "fetus" is Latin for "offspring". So, you know, there you have it.

#notastatesrightsissue

Political expediency because women want to abort unwanted babies. Safe legal and rare should still be the standard. First trimester

You can go to hell for talking back to your parents. People forget that

Sin is sin. We live in a secular society. Best you can do is save souls one at a time. Jesus would forgive the woman who has an abortion.

Preach the word brother. Save the sinner and the sin goes away

Allegedly

Note, for the record, that mine is a secular view. Mike Damone is an atheist, allegedly.

You can't go to jail for talking back to your parents, but you can for murdering them.

The religious implications will be handled in the end by someone other than me.

I'm preaching, but nobody is listening. Story of my life IMO.

The secular view is bolsterd by charging double murder if a woman is preggers

But a secular society sets its rules. We could bathe in the blood of our enemies if we wanted

 

[creepycoug]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass. [/b]

You didn't need to add that. Gratuitous IMO. I hope you can live with yourself.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass. [/b]

You didn't need to add that. Gratuitous IMO. I hope you can live with yourself.

Pragmatic Throbber is pragmatic. We've already been through the correct moral decision. We live in a representative republic - and compromise is necessary on the political front to reach reasonable solutions.

All or nothing ban is a loser political strategy and cedes control to the opposition.

The Throbber supports the states right to govern so if Florida goes with 6 weeks, then so be it - but that line in the sand will have ripple effects elsewhere and nutcases like the Washington state legislature will go full-bore abortion up until birth as allowable.

 

[TurdBomber]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life.

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

 

[creepycoug]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass. [/b]

You didn't need to add that. Gratuitous IMO. I hope you can live with yourself.

Pragmatic Throbber is pragmatic. We've already been through the correct moral decision. We live in a representative republic - and compromise is necessary on the political front to reach reasonable solutions.

All or nothing ban is a loser political strategy and cedes control to the opposition.

The Throbber supports the states right to govern so if Florida goes with 6 weeks, then so be it - but that line in the sand will have ripple effects elsewhere and nutcases like the Washington state legislature will go full-bore abortion up until birth as allowable.

Get back to me when Alabama makes it a felony for jerking off to images of unclean women. Then you'll change your tune.

The unborn have the right to live. You have the right to please yourself. These things are spelled out in the constitution.

 

[creepycoug]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass. [/b]

You didn't need to add that. Gratuitous IMO. I hope you can live with yourself.

Pragmatic Throbber is pragmatic. We've already been through the correct moral decision. We live in a representative republic - and compromise is necessary on the political front to reach reasonable solutions.

All or nothing ban is a loser political strategy and cedes control to the opposition.

The Throbber supports the states right to govern so if Florida goes with 6 weeks, then so be it - but that line in the sand will have ripple effects elsewhere and nutcases like the Washington state legislature will go full-bore abortion up until birth as allowable.

Get back to me when Alabama makes it a felony for jerking off to images of unclean women. Then you'll change your tune.

Wasn't aware that unlike abortion, illegal jerking isn't on the table. Almost a dazzler like move on the strawman without forking out for dinner.

 

[Sledog]

"Nippers" Gosnell would cut their spines at the neck after getting them out alive. The fucking horror of this shit is off the charts. How any woman can do this to their child is also unimaginable. I can tell if do something to my children, grandchildren or family very, very bad things will happen to you. Age does not matter.

Gosnell is in prison.

Non-felon MDs aren't murdering viable fetuses.

Look how long it took for him to get to prison. He was doing that shit forever. I'm sure their are other shitbag abortion docs as well.

 

[HHusky]

"Nippers" Gosnell would cut their spines at the neck after getting them out alive. The fucking horror of this shit is off the charts. How any woman can do this to their child is also unimaginable. I can tell if do something to my children, grandchildren or family very, very bad things will happen to you. Age does not matter.

Gosnell is in prison.

Non-felon MDs aren't murdering viable fetuses.

Look how long it took for him to get to prison. He was doing that shit forever. I'm sure their are other shitbag abortion docs as well.

Well, if you're[/b] sure, I guess you don't need any actual facts.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass. [/b]

You didn't need to add that. Gratuitous IMO. I hope you can live with yourself.

Pragmatic Throbber is pragmatic. We've already been through the correct moral decision. We live in a representative republic - and compromise is necessary on the political front to reach reasonable solutions.

All or nothing ban is a loser political strategy and cedes control to the opposition.

The Throbber supports the states right to govern so if Florida goes with 6 weeks, then so be it - but that line in the sand will have ripple effects elsewhere and nutcases like the Washington state legislature will go full-bore abortion up until birth as allowable.

Get back to me when Alabama makes it a felony for jerking off to images of unclean women. Then you'll change your tune.

The unborn have the right to live. You have the right to please yourself. These things are spelled out in the constitution.

1 - don't live in Alabama. But there are 49 other states whereby jerking to unclean women would still be permissible in hypothetical USA.

2 - the states get to decide the terms (or not) per the SCOTUS ruling. Therefore some might go to the zero tolerance approach.

Not arguing the morality.

 

[creepycoug]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass. [/b]

You didn't need to add that. Gratuitous IMO. I hope you can live with yourself.

Pragmatic Throbber is pragmatic. We've already been through the correct moral decision. We live in a representative republic - and compromise is necessary on the political front to reach reasonable solutions.

All or nothing ban is a loser political strategy and cedes control to the opposition.

The Throbber supports the states right to govern so if Florida goes with 6 weeks, then so be it - but that line in the sand will have ripple effects elsewhere and nutcases like the Washington state legislature will go full-bore abortion up until birth as allowable.

Get back to me when Alabama makes it a felony for jerking off to images of unclean women. Then you'll change your tune.

The unborn have the right to live. You have the right to please yourself. These things are spelled out in the constitution.

1 - don't live in Alabama. But there are 49 other states whereby jerking to unclean women would still be permissible in hypothetical USA.

2 - the states get to decide the terms (or not) per the SCOTUS ruling. Therefore some might go to the zero tolerance approach.

Not arguing the morality.

1. Let's say the DAWGS! decide to schedule an OOC with the hillbillies and you're in Tuscaloosa and you're striking out left and right because the local talent can smell the north on you. You're back in your hotel room and you need to rub one out so you can get some shut eye. Boom! You're done.

2 I know that. I have this issue down pretty well. For the learned among us, that is not where the analysis ends. We are a country based on at least fundamental Judeo-Christian ethics, and as such murder of the innocent with state sponsorship is flatly offensive. Pleasing oneself in private may be open to debate. Haven't thought that one through yet.

 

[TurdBomber]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

 

[creepycoug]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.

 

[TurdBomber]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.[/b]

At least 50% of women will never, ever go there. Maybe even 70%.

 

[RaceBannon]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.

I'm in favor of euthanasia

It would have been the right thing to do for our mom

 

[creepycoug]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.

I'm in favor of euthanasia

It would have been the right thing to do for our mom

Different issue though. And as long as your mom was of sound mind either (1) when she consented to euthanasia or (2) when she consented to give you / others her proxy, I have no issue with it. This is what distinguishes my view from the religious.

Basically her choice or a valid proxy for her choice. We might have a discussion about what to do in situations w/o (1) or (2), but it still doesn't cover off the fetus issue.

 

[creepycoug]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.[/b]

At least 50% of women will never, ever go there. Maybe even 70%.

Political reality doesn't change the moral equation. God knows our politics are anything but an exercise in true moral thinking.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.

I'm in favor of euthanasia

It would have been the right thing to do for our mom

Sort of ditto with my Mom. She was religiously opposed, but at the end of a year and a half of misery she wanted out, but then it was to late for the assisted suicide protocol. If someone treated their dog like that they would be ostracized for the mistreatment.

 

[RaceBannon]

My mom said when of sound mind that she wanted us to kill her if she went bad

Instead she got 5 to 10 of dementia because she was so healthy

At that point she isn't of sound mind

 

[PurpleThrobber]

I also see a lot of “GOOD LUCK IN 2024 LADIES!!!!” from HH and zero in the way of making an argument against the legislation.

I personally think 6 weeks is a tight frame, and I’m not factoring the subjective argument in terms of when life begins that the left likes to get itself embroiled in.

For me, it’s what’s a reasonable timeline for someone to learn that they’re pregnant and make a rational decision to keep or terminate the pregnancy. 6 weeks is enough for many people, but apparently not all, and I get that. I had a friend whose aunt was 10 weeks along before she knew she and her husband were expecting. It’s not the norm but it definitely happens.

The Throbber is an expert on the female anatomy and skillfully tracking when his significant other’s period is scheduled. No nookie during the rainy season.

Needs to be set at least at 8 to 9 weeks so a skipped period doesn’t trigger an immediate trip to the abortion clinic during the first pass.

Whatever the time-frame, it'll always be a compromise and terminating a life. [/b]

Make it 16 to 20 weeks.

Some fat dumb women won't know until then, sad to say, and it's probably better for humanity that those folks don't propagate.

You are in contention for joining the right side. We have our eyes on you.

Sacrifices are part of life. Getting 50% of your way is better than losing 100%.

If a woman wants to off her fetus somewhere approaching viability that's between her and the man upstairs.

I don't have to agree with it to accept it as a fact of modern life.

True. But we pass laws all the time that take personal decisions into the public domain. So, "It was my personal decision to kill by mother-in-law" is fine, but we're prosecuting that person anyway because we decided we can't live with that personal decision.

Same thing here. The trick is helping people understand what it is they're doing, even if it's on day 1. Political expediency and consensus has (or should have) nothing to do with it. It should be axiomatic.

It should be but that's not the republic to which we were born (or came to in floaties and boats like your people).

We are a nation of compromise.

And sometimes that means taking a 90% win vs. a 100% absolute.