Excellent. Well done getting the site up. My worthless opinion:
tone down some of the swearing if we're going to be sending this out to donors, media, fence-sitters and other such people who might be turned off by the foul language. Not that Lil' Kim doesn't deserve to be labeled a fucktard, he does, but we can keep that shit on HH. Keep the page as professional as possible, no exclamation marks, don't say 'pro-Sark stupidity', just have a 'fact sheet' section, 'coaching candidates' section and a 'debunking pro-Sarkisian arguments' section. We can aggregate all of the relevant facts and debunking points in this thread, or at least together on this forum.
To appeal to the broadest base we should keep it as classy as possible, just emphasize what our rightful place is in CFB and how the failures of the current regime are more than enough to justify a firing.
IMO Pete Lembo and Chuck Martin should be on the candidate list too. Among many others.
I'll be checking out the site more today but I want to emphasize what Gladstone said.
As much as we mock Kim, he has a point when he labeled us a fringe element. I don't think we're as fringe as he says but most people look at us, this site, our conversations and shake their heads. They might agree with us on some topics but we're too RUFF around the edges for most people.
Additionally, we are, for the most part, a bunch of negative, cynical, sarcastic assholes. Again, most people see that and shake their heads.
People want to feel good about themselves and the program. 7-6 is better than 0-12. It's not great but UW is staying out of the news and the perception is that it's a clean program so most people can point to it and say, "yeah, Sark's not great but he's improving and the program looks good." They want to feel good about themselves.
If Kim is right and we're a fringe group, I think we represent 10-20% of the fan population. Uber-Doogs like SF14AFS and Huskyclaus are on the other end of the spectrum representing another 10-20% of the fan population.
That leaves 60-80% of the fan population somewhere in the middle. They want to feel good about themselves and the football program. Most of them don't have the time to do the critical thinking necessary to understand why Sark isn't the guy. They know UW can do better but they don't have time to do the work to find out why or how. They listen to the so-called analysis from ESPN and KJR but don't take apart that analysis to see if it's based on sound logic and evidence.
With all that said, any site aimed at improving the the coaching situation at UW needs to be positive and simple. It doesn't need to be HH-lite. Leave the negativity and swearing here.