Fire Jonathan Smith

But fire Smiffy before he ruins another QB. That's essential.

Jake is Jake and is his own shit show. You can blame a lot on Smiff, as you all do, but that's a stretch radio.

And Smiff himself was a hell of a QB. If brown socks were half the QB Smiff was Washington would be ... never mind ... you'd still be fucked.

He had Chad Ochocinco and TJ terrorist to throw to.

But you're just hear to hear yourself talk as usual

Fuck off you wounded little faggot. Take it like a man or put the barrel in your mouth already. If you don't know that Smith could throw it and was a big part of that passing attack you either weren't Around or are retarded or both. It didn't matter who's catching it if tournWB shots himself at the first sign of trouble. Smith, for all his faults, was no Jake.

Who gives a fucking shit what kind of player Smiff was? It has absolutely nothing to do with how shitty an O.C. he is.

Why do you have to be told this? Are you retarded? Or just dumb?

Why are you such a Fucking faggot who can't read? I didn't say what you said I said fuck face. In fact nobody did you dumb dick licker. I said if Jake were 1/2 the QB Smiff was ... I don't give a fuck about him as an OC. That's your problem Sally.

Go lick your mom's twat again and come back when you're better focused. And try and read better next time dumb fuck.

You worthless POS.

You seem really upset. I'm sorry you're feeling frustrated. I'm surebitnsucksnti be such a dumb fucking homo with such limited ability to read. That's your momma's fault; not mine.

Non matter what happens tomorrow, my weekend is made. Watch Washington lose. Nothing else matters.

I can't wait for the Cup.

As I said, this is as good as it gets for a Cuog. Relish it. It's as high as your sad life ever soars.

That hurts.

I know. Which feels great to me.

Keep drinking the whiskey and coke. It actually helps.

But tomorrow you will wake up and, alas, the ugly fact of this game will be waiting for you: the #1 defense in the mighty P12 lost to a one-legged running back and a retarded passing game.

Beyond that, you still have the Apple Cup in front of you; and despite what you say here, you are starting to realize that your defense isn't quite the juggernaut you thought it was, and your QB seems to get shittier each week you don't play Oregon. You are now, finally, starting to absorb the reality that the AC is a very loseable gayme for you fuckers.

Have a great weekend.

Every football match up is a unique contest. And Stanford at home is the type of squad that can exploit our weaknesses.

Here it comes.

That was a GOOD Stanford team. And 1/2 a ❤️ is better than any back in the country!

If by "type" you mean an incredibly one dimensional offense whose one dimension was a shell of itself, then yeah I see your point.

Can't wait.

You twist better than Chubby Checker on cocaine Creep. You chose the right. profession in life so you got that going for you.
 
The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible

Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.

He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it.
 
The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible

Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.

He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it.

That play, with that player, is all you need to see from Smiff. He doesn't coach to his offensive talent, especially in the passing game, but also in most of the run game.

And what was with 4 or 5 counter plays when Stanford had massive penetration into the backfield each time? It's almost as if Smiff doesn't realize teams adjust and the same play won't work every time.
 
The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible

Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.

He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it.

That play, with that player, is all you need to see from Smiff. He doesn't coach to his offensive talent, especially in the passing game, but also in most of the run game.

And what was with 4 or 5 counter plays when Stanford had massive penetration into the backfield each time? It's almost as if Smiff doesn't realize teams adjust and the same play won't work every time.

It’s a desperation play call called because he doesn’t trust his QB in the passing game ... a QB that he is responsible for coaching
 
The most unexplainable play call of the game was running the Ahmed reverse play w Pettis instead of Ahmed and not running the play until down 16 ... that was just terrible

Pettis is a downfield WR. He’s good at going up and getting the ball. He’s a long strider too. He’s good once he gets going.

He can make a guy miss and does frequently on punt returns, but even on those normally he gets a block or two, makes a guy or two miss, and houses it.

That play, with that player, is all you need to see from Smiff. He doesn't coach to his offensive talent, especially in the passing game, but also in most of the run game.

And what was with 4 or 5 counter plays when Stanford had massive penetration into the backfield each time? It's almost as if Smiff doesn't realize teams adjust and the same play won't work every time.

It’s a desperation play call called because he doesn’t trust his QB in the passing game ... a QB that he is responsible for coaching

A) he doesn't put his QB in the best places to succeed (Play action)

B) his head coach told the world after Montana Jake was sneaky good on scrambles. Sadly Jake listened and thinks he's Russell Wilson/Fran Tarkington

C) Savon had two touches??????? This goes back to not having an identity on offense so when it gets tough, we don't have any go to bread and butter plays.
 
Back
Top