Fascism is a right wing ideology

[RaceBannon]

Microsoft has made billions

How much have companies and individuals made using Microsoft products. Time is money.

The answer is a lot

Again being old as dirt I remember when the fax machine became common. A revolutionary business tool. Barely got in before the email, internet, and software revolution

One man or woman can do the work of 10 same as it has always been with industrial revolutions yet the population is bigger than ever and there is more wealth than ever

The best chance for the most people remains capitalism. Preferably without retard socialists mucking it up

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.

 

[Bob_C]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
it is a game of waiting I guess

I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.

View attachment 41615

Bernie was always a millionaire. If he wasn’t before his book deal then he has no business running a budget committee. It’s not that hard to be a millionaire, almost impossible on a government salary.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Microsoft has made billions

How much have companies and individuals made using Microsoft products. Time is money.

The answer is a lot

Again being old as dirt I remember when the fax machine became common. A revolutionary business tool. Barely got in before the email, internet, and software revolution

One man or woman can do the work of 10 same as it has always been with industrial revolutions yet the population is bigger than ever and there is more wealth than ever

The best chance for the most people remains capitalism. Preferably without retard socialists mucking it up

Such an obvious point, but the slobberer clings to the North Korean economic model. No private ownership of the land means no agricultural production. But who needs or wants food for their family?

 

[SFGbob]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.

Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.

 

[Bob_C]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.

Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.

Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.

Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.

Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.

Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.

Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.

Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.

Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity.

Disagree, supply and demand aren't theoretical but the basics for understanding how capitalism works. Facebook and Google are now monopolies and should be broken up. Competition is good for the economy and freedom and liberty. I agree that finance and basic accounting should be taught in the public schools. All Americans should understand an income statement, a balance sheet and cash flow. Our current MSM is the most poorly educated media in our country's history. There isn't one leftard on the Pump that I would describe as truly educated in the basics of science, math, history and economics. Anyone voting for the dementia patient and supporting Fow Chee is not only not educated but what they think they know is wrong.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.

Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.

Ftr I had an excellent Econ teacher at public. That was all he did. It's what grounded my interest and ability in the subject going forward. It was still only a semester senior year though and this was 20 yrs ago.

It's better than hiring ethnic studies majors to teach CRT even if done poorly.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.

Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.

Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.

Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.

Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity.

Disagree, supply and demand aren't theoretical but the basics for understanding how capitalism works. Facebook and Google are now monopolies and should be broken up. Competition is good for the economy and freedom and liberty. I agree that finance and basic accounting should be taught in the public schools. All Americans should understand an income statement, a balance sheet and cash flow. Our current MSM is the most poorly educated media in our country's history. There isn't one leftard on the Pump that I would describe as truly educated in the basics of science, math, history and economics. Anyone voting for the dementia patient and supporting Fow Chee is not only not educated but what they think they know is wrong.

This, classical economics is pretty easy, straightforward, and barebones but super important.

Look no further than our resident leftists to see how an ignorance of basic concepts can be abused by those seeking power.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

If leftists understood economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

This is why economics as a curriculum has been eliminated from public schooling. Meanwhile we aren't not teaching CRT and gender studies.

Would you really have faith in an economics class taught by the current crop of public school teachers? They'd do as good a job with that as they now do with nearly all subjects.

Personal finance and or basic accounting are better thing to teach in schools, tons of practicality.

Basic probabilities and statistical analysis is widely not understood either.

Economics is very theoretical in many senses, as we’ve seen from this thread easy to misinterpret or construe with insanity.

Disagree, supply and demand aren't theoretical but the basics for understanding how capitalism works. Facebook and Google are now monopolies and should be broken up. Competition is good for the economy and freedom and liberty. I agree that finance and basic accounting should be taught in the public schools. All Americans should understand an income statement, a balance sheet and cash flow. Our current MSM is the most poorly educated media in our country's history. There isn't one leftard on the Pump that I would describe as truly educated in the basics of science, math, history and economics. Anyone voting for the dementia patient and supporting Fow Chee is not only not educated but what they think they know is wrong.

This, classical economics is pretty easy, straightforward, and barebones but super important.

Look no further than our resident leftists to see how an ignorance of basic concepts can be abused by those seeking power.

Exactly, the basics get you in the door. Same with math and science. You don't need to have three years of geometry. You just need to be able to add, subtract, understand percentages and multiplication/division and basic algebra.

 

[greenblood]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.

Is that a Trabant?

 

[Bob_C]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.

Is that a Trabant?

As long as everyone has the exact same one, then that’s progress.

 

[TheKobeStopper]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.

What do you drive them on?

 

[Bob_C]

Obama’s roads

 

[hardhat]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.

What do you drive them on?

How do you pay your rent?

 

[TheKobeStopper]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
it is a game of waiting I guess

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
it is a game of waiting I guess

I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.

View attachment 41615

“Bernie said this”

-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-

I’ve been bludgeoned.

 

[46XiJCAB]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
it is a game of waiting I guess

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
it is a game of waiting I guess

I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.

View attachment 41615

“Bernie said this”

-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-

I’ve been bludgeoned.

Bernie is a Commie son, find another hero.

 

[Sledog]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
it is a game of waiting I guess

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

Bernie 5 years ago said every millionaire was a failure - then changed to billionaire when he became a millionaire.
it is a game of waiting I guess

I mean, we both know he didn’t. Not sure what the point of this lie is.

View attachment 41615

“Bernie said this”

-bunch of tweets where Bernie doesn’t say it-

I’ve been bludgeoned.

We know you've been bludgeoned. No other possible way you get that stupid.

 

[pawz]

Fun fact- Sargon once threw a bitch fit on Twitter because this girl

View attachment 44237

wouldn’t fuck him. In case you were wondering what kind intellectual heavyweight this was coming from.

Glad to see you went for the ad hom. I would too if you were spouting talking points from memes and espousing an idealogy dead for 40 years.

I can’t comment on the content of a video I’m not going to watch.

Marriage of the state and capital...hmmm why does that sound familiar.

In opposition to classic liberalism which seeks decentralization, freedom of capital[/b], and a limited state.

You’re on the side that elected a billionaire capitalist as president, right?

Big fans of capital and the state not being merged?

This is the fatal flaw in capitalism. Eventually the few will accumulate so much that they can do anything they want and what they’re going to want is more.

You can cut wages and benefits. You can increase productivity. You can outsource jobs. But eventually you’re going to run into laws that prevent you from making more. The way to solve this is to be the one that writes them.

We have capitalists, in a capitalist economy, using the freedom of capitol (that you gave them) to do what capitalists are supposed to do, make more. It’s not a marriage, it’s a purchase.

And you’re not actually against any of it. You just want it to benefit you. Happy to elect the billionaire. Celebrate elected officials opposing bills because their wealthy donors told them to. You know what’s coming and you’re just dogs begging for scraps. It’s pathetic.

Dumbass over hear doesn’t realize socialism is riddled with rich socialites that dictate their will on others and hold them down.

People are going to be rich in a capitalist system, that’s fine. But they don’t have to be billionaires.

Every billionaire is a policy failure.

And that's what kills new ideas and innovation.

Billionaires or the drive to be one are the reasons why we don't drive this to work.

What do you drive them on?

How do you pay your rent?

ISWYDT. Bravo.