Fake Narratives Open Thread

Joey

Joey

Swaye's Wigwam
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
Oregon is a better football team than last year. Apparently UW isn’t.

Dan made the kids work and get better during the bye. Kalen didn’t.

Inclement weather will hurt Washington’s passing game. Won’t hurt Bo’s though.

Washington hasn’t played anybody with a SOS at 49. Oregons is better at 97.

1 Troy Franklin > Odunze, McMillan and Polk.

Bucky Irving is Jim Brown.

Oregons line > Washington’s line. Can’t name anyone on it besides an overrated Seattle kid but still

Bo has the big game advantage with a 2-9 record against ranked teams away from home. Including the neutral field game against Oregon. Booooodacious.
 
Oregon is rooted in substance. Not for clicks. Watch us unveil bird shit uniforms this week
 
Last edited:
Dan's wife probably is a faker

meg-ryan-orgasm.gif

 
Dan’s in full control of this team. Watch him have a coke fueled meltdown on a reporter and tell me it’s not normal!
 
Their metrics are based on beating the shit out of a team that America still thinks is good, at home. If you're squeaking out a win against ASU playing their 9th/10th OL and 3rd string quarterback, and broken dude named Skattebo, you are a bottom 3/4 PAC 12 team who will get blasted by all of the true 1-5 teams especially if you're on the road.

Arizona is probably the only team in the league to play their best game on the road and not have a noticeable dropoff. That is just how the league is this year unless you're playing at one of the Bay schools.
 
Media and social media dorks love Oregon. You have to remember that going into last year's game the narrative was if Oregon could beat Georgia if they played again based on Oregon beating UCLA at home as part of UCLA's yearly second half collapse and beating up crap teams. Then UW won in Eugene but about 8 days later it was like it never happened again.

Just gotta win and advance.
 
Here's my favorite I've heard from several "experts"

"Oregon is just tougher than Washington."

I'm sorry, but how is toughness being measured? What is the formula for that? It seems like made-up bullshit.

I think Oregon has a good team and could win this game, but a lot of these narratives just don't make any sense.
 
“We have a different team this year on defense. We got rid of the four and five star guys we didn’t want anymore and replaced them with everyone else’s four and five star guys they didn’t want anymore.” Big difference.
 
You have to remember that going into last year's game the narrative was if Oregon could beat Georgia if they played again based on Oregon beating UCLA at home as part of UCLA's yearly second half collapse and beating up crap teams.
Click to expand...

Huh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top