Jackson explained that because of upcoming expected litigation [the First Circuit has already scheduled argument], she did not believe the case met the standard for emergency review as requested.
"In my view, these applicants have not met this high bar," Jackson explained in her opinion. "First, the applicants have failed to show that there exist 'critical and exigent circumstances' necessitating intervention."
"The applicants have not asserted that there are any significant legislative votes scheduled in the upcoming weeks; that there are any upcoming votes in which Libby's participation would impact the outcome; or that they will otherwise suffer any concrete, imminent, and significant harm while the lower court considers this matter," she continued.
The Twitter lied to you, Race. You're a fairly ordinary simpleton.