ESPN Interview: Sark now Sounding like a Politician
- Thread starter administrator
- Start date
Steve_Bowman
New Fish
I try to be a bit dignified most of the time, but this is too much.
Long story short, Cream Puff is a piece of shit.
Long story short, Cream Puff is a piece of shit.
I don't know what else we're suppose to expect from our head football coach-in-training as he struggles to find his learning curve. Like his four(4) predecessors at UW, Steve Sarkisian is obviously not Don James, who regardless of ticket sales or new stadium construction could with grace and stoic humor blow-off stupid questions from the media while staying honest to himself, his program, players, and fans rather that feed us spin and fluffy hyperbole like a politician. DJ's intellect seemed to occupy different ground when confronted by inane questions in a forum designed for horn blowing and that is why the Dawgfather was always(IMO) hated by the Seattle print, radio, and TV media....... and as we know, there can be little love lost there.
Successful football coaches are not always good copy for sound & sight traps such as ESPN largely because they don't have to be........ which often is a significant part of what makes them great. As we've seen for ions from the other side of the Cascades, unsuccessful coaches of loser programs usually must have the gift of gab and the ability to lie convincingly in order to keep their jobs long enough to build something. Regardless of the fluffy talk and hyperbole, usually known in political circles as propaganda, 2013 is the season for Sark to prove that he can become successful as we define football success at UW. I think many of us already know that he is not the coach we wanted for resurrecting Husky Football after 0-12. The only question remaining for me is whether or not Sark can ever become the coach we need and that can only be decided on the gridiron.
Successful football coaches are not always good copy for sound & sight traps such as ESPN largely because they don't have to be........ which often is a significant part of what makes them great. As we've seen for ions from the other side of the Cascades, unsuccessful coaches of loser programs usually must have the gift of gab and the ability to lie convincingly in order to keep their jobs long enough to build something. Regardless of the fluffy talk and hyperbole, usually known in political circles as propaganda, 2013 is the season for Sark to prove that he can become successful as we define football success at UW. I think many of us already know that he is not the coach we wanted for resurrecting Husky Football after 0-12. The only question remaining for me is whether or not Sark can ever become the coach we need and that can only be decided on the gridiron.
HillsboroDuck
New Fish
Harv!!! True???
No doubt, I thought the same thing! BTW, listening to that interview was just plain painful. Sark is in way over his head, and by the tone of his voice and his choice of words, it sure sounded like he knows it.