ESPN gargling some USC sack...

PurpleBaze

PurpleBaze

Swaye's Wigwam
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
...talking about how USC is one of the teams that will make the 16-team playoff system, under the leadership of Sark.

How many games into the season will ESPN realize the error of their ways?
 
The over/under is 5.
Click to expand...

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.
Click to expand...

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.
 
We're going to find out this year whether Shaw is overrated or not. He just lost a bunch of guys. Can he still produce results? Stay tuned...
 
The over/under is 5.
Click to expand...

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.
Click to expand...

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.
Click to expand...
Mods making smart statements might lead me to steal my son's lunch money and donate it to this arm pit.
 
All Shaw has done is win the conference two years running while exposing Oregon's lack of toughness. Absolutely terrible.

The over/under is 5.
Click to expand...

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.
Click to expand...

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.
Click to expand...

Doog.
 
Last edited:
ESPN loves the story that USC is "home" to Sark because Sark played one term as an average baseball player there (one term - not a whole fucking season even) and then was hired back as an assistant under Pete Carroll. Clearly USC = Sark = USC. It's probably on Wikipedia as a symbiotic relationship. Fucking hell.
 
All Shaw the Yeti and crew has done is win the conference two years running while exposing Oregon's lack of toughness 2 inches of thunder. Absolutely terrible.

The over/u 2 nder is 5.
Click to expand...

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.
Click to expand...

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.
Click to expand...

Doog.
Click to expand...

628x471.jpg
 
Shaw is a below average game manager IMO. Overall very quality coach but he costs them wins with his often stubborn and suspicious game day coaching.

47-35434-Y.jpg
 
Shaw is a below average game manager IMO. Overall very quality coach but he costs them wins with his often stubborn and suspicious game day coaching.

47-35434-Y.jpg
Click to expand...

Shaw's coaching has been good to win a ton of games since Harbaugh left but he shit the bed at least once each year (it seems like once per year): @ UW when UW won the Gameday Championship, the bowl game against Oklahoma State where instead of letting Andrew Luck win the game passing or his running back plow through the defense, he put it all the kicker who missed and then the Rose Bowl last year. MSU was a good team but Stanford had more than enough chances to win.

It should be interesting if we find out he's over-rated. It'll also be interesting if we find out he's under-rated.

Either way, it'll be interesting.
 
Shaw's been a great coach overall in my opinion with the exception that he makes one baffling decision in highly pressured games that become his signature.
 
Shaw is a very good coach. Stanford prides themselves on being bigger, smarter, and tougher. He does sometimes make questionable decisions in high pressure situations. He even did against UW when he tried the bootleg on third and one when Peters snuffed that shit out. Their conservative play calling works against them once or twice a year as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top